Using AI for the submission process: Tools & trends

AI tools of varying kinds have been in use for some years now for the submission process for scholarly manuscripts, facilitating tasks such as consistency checking and peer reviewer identification. This talk will delve into examples of these tools, outlining which of the three main strands of AI: ru...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: UPSHALL, Michael
Format: text
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/ai_research_week/Programme/Programme/12
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/ai_research_week/article/1008/type/native/viewcontent/AI_in_Publishing_and_Peer_Review__Tools___Trends___AI_for_Research_Week_2024__1_.mp4
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/ai_research_week/article/1008/filename/0/type/additional/viewcontent/Upshall_Using_AI_for_the_submission_process.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Description
Summary:AI tools of varying kinds have been in use for some years now for the submission process for scholarly manuscripts, facilitating tasks such as consistency checking and peer reviewer identification. This talk will delve into examples of these tools, outlining which of the three main strands of AI: rule-based, statistics-based, and deep-learning based, are most appropriate in each case, while considering their benefits and drawbacks. Despite their potential, the inconsistent usage of these tools has sparked debates over the suitability of these tools ("Do these tools replace humans?") and their impact on publication quality. Decisions on AI integration into workflows are crucial, considering the limitations of certain AI methodologies.The talk aims to provide insights into the effective deployment of AI tools, emphasizing the combination of machine tools and human evaluation to enhance scholarly publication quality while minimizing human effort.