Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects
People generally believe they are less susceptible than others to influences of media, and a growing body of research implicates such biased processing, or third-person perception, in public support for censorship, a type of third-person effect. The current study extends research of the third-person...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cis_research/171 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/cis_research/article/1170/viewcontent/Efficacy_beliefs_in_third_person_effects_av.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.cis_research-1170 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.cis_research-11702024-08-13T01:49:49Z Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects ROSENTHAL, Sonny DETENBER, Benjamin H. ROJAS, Hernando People generally believe they are less susceptible than others to influences of media, and a growing body of research implicates such biased processing, or third-person perception, in public support for censorship, a type of third-person effect. The current study extends research of the third-person effect by studying two efficacy-related concepts in the context of sexual content in films. Analysis of cross-sectional data from 1,012 Singaporeans suggests that people exhibit self-other asymmetries of efficacy beliefs: They believe others are less capable than they are of self-regulation and that censorship is more effective at restricting others’ access to sexual content in films. Furthermore, the former belief was directly related to the belief that others are more susceptible to negative influence, and thus was indirectly related to support for censorship; whereas the latter belief was directly related to support for censorship. Results may help distinguish the roles of self-regulation and government censorship as bases of local media standards. 2018-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cis_research/171 info:doi/10.1177/0093650215570657 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/cis_research/article/1170/viewcontent/Efficacy_beliefs_in_third_person_effects_av.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection College of Integrative Studies eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University censorship efficacy self-regulation sexual content third-person effect Critical and Cultural Studies Social Media |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
censorship efficacy self-regulation sexual content third-person effect Critical and Cultural Studies Social Media |
spellingShingle |
censorship efficacy self-regulation sexual content third-person effect Critical and Cultural Studies Social Media ROSENTHAL, Sonny DETENBER, Benjamin H. ROJAS, Hernando Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects |
description |
People generally believe they are less susceptible than others to influences of media, and a growing body of research implicates such biased processing, or third-person perception, in public support for censorship, a type of third-person effect. The current study extends research of the third-person effect by studying two efficacy-related concepts in the context of sexual content in films. Analysis of cross-sectional data from 1,012 Singaporeans suggests that people exhibit self-other asymmetries of efficacy beliefs: They believe others are less capable than they are of self-regulation and that censorship is more effective at restricting others’ access to sexual content in films. Furthermore, the former belief was directly related to the belief that others are more susceptible to negative influence, and thus was indirectly related to support for censorship; whereas the latter belief was directly related to support for censorship. Results may help distinguish the roles of self-regulation and government censorship as bases of local media standards. |
format |
text |
author |
ROSENTHAL, Sonny DETENBER, Benjamin H. ROJAS, Hernando |
author_facet |
ROSENTHAL, Sonny DETENBER, Benjamin H. ROJAS, Hernando |
author_sort |
ROSENTHAL, Sonny |
title |
Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects |
title_short |
Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects |
title_full |
Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects |
title_fullStr |
Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects |
title_sort |
efficacy beliefs in third-person effects |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cis_research/171 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/cis_research/article/1170/viewcontent/Efficacy_beliefs_in_third_person_effects_av.pdf |
_version_ |
1814047770404716544 |