Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects

People generally believe they are less susceptible than others to influences of media, and a growing body of research implicates such biased processing, or third-person perception, in public support for censorship, a type of third-person effect. The current study extends research of the third-person...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ROSENTHAL, Sonny, DETENBER, Benjamin H., ROJAS, Hernando
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cis_research/171
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/cis_research/article/1170/viewcontent/Efficacy_beliefs_in_third_person_effects_av.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.cis_research-1170
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.cis_research-11702024-08-13T01:49:49Z Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects ROSENTHAL, Sonny DETENBER, Benjamin H. ROJAS, Hernando People generally believe they are less susceptible than others to influences of media, and a growing body of research implicates such biased processing, or third-person perception, in public support for censorship, a type of third-person effect. The current study extends research of the third-person effect by studying two efficacy-related concepts in the context of sexual content in films. Analysis of cross-sectional data from 1,012 Singaporeans suggests that people exhibit self-other asymmetries of efficacy beliefs: They believe others are less capable than they are of self-regulation and that censorship is more effective at restricting others’ access to sexual content in films. Furthermore, the former belief was directly related to the belief that others are more susceptible to negative influence, and thus was indirectly related to support for censorship; whereas the latter belief was directly related to support for censorship. Results may help distinguish the roles of self-regulation and government censorship as bases of local media standards. 2018-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cis_research/171 info:doi/10.1177/0093650215570657 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/cis_research/article/1170/viewcontent/Efficacy_beliefs_in_third_person_effects_av.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection College of Integrative Studies eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University censorship efficacy self-regulation sexual content third-person effect Critical and Cultural Studies Social Media
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic censorship
efficacy
self-regulation
sexual content
third-person effect
Critical and Cultural Studies
Social Media
spellingShingle censorship
efficacy
self-regulation
sexual content
third-person effect
Critical and Cultural Studies
Social Media
ROSENTHAL, Sonny
DETENBER, Benjamin H.
ROJAS, Hernando
Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects
description People generally believe they are less susceptible than others to influences of media, and a growing body of research implicates such biased processing, or third-person perception, in public support for censorship, a type of third-person effect. The current study extends research of the third-person effect by studying two efficacy-related concepts in the context of sexual content in films. Analysis of cross-sectional data from 1,012 Singaporeans suggests that people exhibit self-other asymmetries of efficacy beliefs: They believe others are less capable than they are of self-regulation and that censorship is more effective at restricting others’ access to sexual content in films. Furthermore, the former belief was directly related to the belief that others are more susceptible to negative influence, and thus was indirectly related to support for censorship; whereas the latter belief was directly related to support for censorship. Results may help distinguish the roles of self-regulation and government censorship as bases of local media standards.
format text
author ROSENTHAL, Sonny
DETENBER, Benjamin H.
ROJAS, Hernando
author_facet ROSENTHAL, Sonny
DETENBER, Benjamin H.
ROJAS, Hernando
author_sort ROSENTHAL, Sonny
title Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects
title_short Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects
title_full Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects
title_fullStr Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects
title_sort efficacy beliefs in third-person effects
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2018
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cis_research/171
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/cis_research/article/1170/viewcontent/Efficacy_beliefs_in_third_person_effects_av.pdf
_version_ 1814047770404716544