Current state of geoengineering

There are, broadly speaking, three ways in which scientists and policymakers talk about responding to the anthropogenic climate change. We can mitigate the effects, adapt to it, or we can utilize geoengineering techniques to offset its harmful impacts. As it currently stands, most reasonable scienti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: LUCZAK, Joshua
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cis_research/264
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.cis_research-1263
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.cis_research-12632025-01-09T09:12:02Z Current state of geoengineering LUCZAK, Joshua There are, broadly speaking, three ways in which scientists and policymakers talk about responding to the anthropogenic climate change. We can mitigate the effects, adapt to it, or we can utilize geoengineering techniques to offset its harmful impacts. As it currently stands, most reasonable scientists, policymakers, and thinkers hold that some combination of adaptation together with an aggressive mitigation strategy is the most appropriate, all things considered, way to respond to the problem. Since we are already committed to some climate change, any response to the problem must include some kind of adaptation strategy. But, for a collection of reasons, aggressive mitigation has to be the focus of our policy response. It is the best, safest, and most fair way to resolve the problem in the long run. Despite this, talk of incorporating forms of geoengineering into our overall response strategy have grown in recent times. In light of this trend, this chapter provides an overview of geoengineering that is relevant for policymakers and lawmakers. This chapter describes the most common and influential geoengineering techniques that have been proposed and gives the reader a sense of where geoengineering techniques sit in the minds of scientists and policymakers. There is currently a dearth of laws and regulations that are directly aimed at ensuring the safe development, testing, and deployment of geoengineering techniques. There is also a lack of governance overseeing the research and development of these techniques. This chapter serves as a partial primer for anyone interested in wading into policy and legal issues surrounding geoengineering. 2024-06-14T07:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cis_research/264 Research Collection College of Integrative Studies eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Climate change Adaptation strategy Mitigation strategy Geoengineering techniques Governance Environmental Policy Place and Environment
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Climate change
Adaptation strategy
Mitigation strategy
Geoengineering techniques
Governance
Environmental Policy
Place and Environment
spellingShingle Climate change
Adaptation strategy
Mitigation strategy
Geoengineering techniques
Governance
Environmental Policy
Place and Environment
LUCZAK, Joshua
Current state of geoengineering
description There are, broadly speaking, three ways in which scientists and policymakers talk about responding to the anthropogenic climate change. We can mitigate the effects, adapt to it, or we can utilize geoengineering techniques to offset its harmful impacts. As it currently stands, most reasonable scientists, policymakers, and thinkers hold that some combination of adaptation together with an aggressive mitigation strategy is the most appropriate, all things considered, way to respond to the problem. Since we are already committed to some climate change, any response to the problem must include some kind of adaptation strategy. But, for a collection of reasons, aggressive mitigation has to be the focus of our policy response. It is the best, safest, and most fair way to resolve the problem in the long run. Despite this, talk of incorporating forms of geoengineering into our overall response strategy have grown in recent times. In light of this trend, this chapter provides an overview of geoengineering that is relevant for policymakers and lawmakers. This chapter describes the most common and influential geoengineering techniques that have been proposed and gives the reader a sense of where geoengineering techniques sit in the minds of scientists and policymakers. There is currently a dearth of laws and regulations that are directly aimed at ensuring the safe development, testing, and deployment of geoengineering techniques. There is also a lack of governance overseeing the research and development of these techniques. This chapter serves as a partial primer for anyone interested in wading into policy and legal issues surrounding geoengineering.
format text
author LUCZAK, Joshua
author_facet LUCZAK, Joshua
author_sort LUCZAK, Joshua
title Current state of geoengineering
title_short Current state of geoengineering
title_full Current state of geoengineering
title_fullStr Current state of geoengineering
title_full_unstemmed Current state of geoengineering
title_sort current state of geoengineering
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2024
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cis_research/264
_version_ 1821237311012077568