Does Morningstar Shine in the Universe of Mutual Funds? A Study on Morningstar Mutual Fund Ratings

Using data from Morningstar Principia CDs and employing standard methodologies, we examine the extent to which two mutual fund ratings: Morningstar star ratings and Morningstar stewardship grades can predict future fund performance. In particular, we investigate whether the combined predictive power...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: NG, Wee Seng
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/etd_coll/10
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=etd_coll
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.etd_coll-1009
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.etd_coll-10092015-09-14T02:53:10Z Does Morningstar Shine in the Universe of Mutual Funds? A Study on Morningstar Mutual Fund Ratings NG, Wee Seng Using data from Morningstar Principia CDs and employing standard methodologies, we examine the extent to which two mutual fund ratings: Morningstar star ratings and Morningstar stewardship grades can predict future fund performance. In particular, we investigate whether the combined predictive power of the two ratings exceeds that of a single rating. We decompose funds into various groups characterized by fund age and fund categories in order to address such issues as whether predictive performance is uniform across characteristic-based groups. Although our analysis shows that none of the ratings alone possesses strong predictive power, there is statistical evidence to support the notion that combined rating is superior to single rating in forecasting future returns. However, the evidence is not overwhelming enough to justify the efficacy of an investment strategy based primarily on Morningstar ratings. Besides studying predictability of ratings, we also construct a logistic regression model to seek potential determinants of the stewardship grades. We find that funds with good stewardship grades are generally those that incur low expenses, possess a large asset base and are managed by experienced fund managers. Finally, we investigate whether the two Morningstar ratings exhibit short-term persistence. Our findings indicate that the degree of persistence (as measured by the percentage of funds that retain their initial rating over a 12-month period) of the stewardship grades is much more pronounced than that of the star ratings. 2009-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/etd_coll/10 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=etd_coll http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Dissertations and Theses Collection (Open Access) eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University mutual funds performance persistence portfolio performance rating services risk aversion Portfolio and Security Analysis
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic mutual funds
performance persistence
portfolio performance
rating services
risk aversion
Portfolio and Security Analysis
spellingShingle mutual funds
performance persistence
portfolio performance
rating services
risk aversion
Portfolio and Security Analysis
NG, Wee Seng
Does Morningstar Shine in the Universe of Mutual Funds? A Study on Morningstar Mutual Fund Ratings
description Using data from Morningstar Principia CDs and employing standard methodologies, we examine the extent to which two mutual fund ratings: Morningstar star ratings and Morningstar stewardship grades can predict future fund performance. In particular, we investigate whether the combined predictive power of the two ratings exceeds that of a single rating. We decompose funds into various groups characterized by fund age and fund categories in order to address such issues as whether predictive performance is uniform across characteristic-based groups. Although our analysis shows that none of the ratings alone possesses strong predictive power, there is statistical evidence to support the notion that combined rating is superior to single rating in forecasting future returns. However, the evidence is not overwhelming enough to justify the efficacy of an investment strategy based primarily on Morningstar ratings. Besides studying predictability of ratings, we also construct a logistic regression model to seek potential determinants of the stewardship grades. We find that funds with good stewardship grades are generally those that incur low expenses, possess a large asset base and are managed by experienced fund managers. Finally, we investigate whether the two Morningstar ratings exhibit short-term persistence. Our findings indicate that the degree of persistence (as measured by the percentage of funds that retain their initial rating over a 12-month period) of the stewardship grades is much more pronounced than that of the star ratings.
format text
author NG, Wee Seng
author_facet NG, Wee Seng
author_sort NG, Wee Seng
title Does Morningstar Shine in the Universe of Mutual Funds? A Study on Morningstar Mutual Fund Ratings
title_short Does Morningstar Shine in the Universe of Mutual Funds? A Study on Morningstar Mutual Fund Ratings
title_full Does Morningstar Shine in the Universe of Mutual Funds? A Study on Morningstar Mutual Fund Ratings
title_fullStr Does Morningstar Shine in the Universe of Mutual Funds? A Study on Morningstar Mutual Fund Ratings
title_full_unstemmed Does Morningstar Shine in the Universe of Mutual Funds? A Study on Morningstar Mutual Fund Ratings
title_sort does morningstar shine in the universe of mutual funds? a study on morningstar mutual fund ratings
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2009
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/etd_coll/10
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=etd_coll
_version_ 1712300814278590464