The Cross-Section of Stock Return and Volatility

There has been increasing research on the cross-sectional relation between stock return and volatility. Conclusions are, however, mixed, partially because volatility or variance is modeled or parameterized in various ways. This paper, by using the Jiang and Tian (2005)'s model-free method, esti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: HAN, Hongchao
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/etd_coll/41
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1040&context=etd_coll
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.etd_coll-1040
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.etd_coll-10402010-09-08T01:24:04Z The Cross-Section of Stock Return and Volatility HAN, Hongchao There has been increasing research on the cross-sectional relation between stock return and volatility. Conclusions are, however, mixed, partially because volatility or variance is modeled or parameterized in various ways. This paper, by using the Jiang and Tian (2005)'s model-free method, estimates daily option implied volatility for all US individual stocks from 1996:01 to 2006:04, and then employs this information to extract monthly volatilities and their idiosyncratic parts for cross-sectional regression analyses. We follow the Fama and French (1992) cross-sectional regression procedure and show that each of the 4 monthly measures of change of total volatility, total volatility, expected idiosyncratic variance, and expected idiosyncratic volatility is a negative priced factor in the cross-sectional variation of stock returns. We also show that the negative correlation between return and total volatility or expected idiosyncratic variance or expected idiosyncratic volatility strengthens as leverage increases or credit rating worsens. However, leverage does not play a role in the relation between return and change of total volatility. Finally, responding to recent papers, we show that the investor sentiment does not have a significant impact on the cross- sectional relation between return and volatility. 2008-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/etd_coll/41 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1040&context=etd_coll http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Dissertations and Theses Collection (Open Access) eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University idiosyncratic volatility discount pricing profitability rate of return stock price forecasting stocks Finance and Financial Management Portfolio and Security Analysis
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic idiosyncratic volatility discount
pricing
profitability
rate of return
stock price forecasting
stocks
Finance and Financial Management
Portfolio and Security Analysis
spellingShingle idiosyncratic volatility discount
pricing
profitability
rate of return
stock price forecasting
stocks
Finance and Financial Management
Portfolio and Security Analysis
HAN, Hongchao
The Cross-Section of Stock Return and Volatility
description There has been increasing research on the cross-sectional relation between stock return and volatility. Conclusions are, however, mixed, partially because volatility or variance is modeled or parameterized in various ways. This paper, by using the Jiang and Tian (2005)'s model-free method, estimates daily option implied volatility for all US individual stocks from 1996:01 to 2006:04, and then employs this information to extract monthly volatilities and their idiosyncratic parts for cross-sectional regression analyses. We follow the Fama and French (1992) cross-sectional regression procedure and show that each of the 4 monthly measures of change of total volatility, total volatility, expected idiosyncratic variance, and expected idiosyncratic volatility is a negative priced factor in the cross-sectional variation of stock returns. We also show that the negative correlation between return and total volatility or expected idiosyncratic variance or expected idiosyncratic volatility strengthens as leverage increases or credit rating worsens. However, leverage does not play a role in the relation between return and change of total volatility. Finally, responding to recent papers, we show that the investor sentiment does not have a significant impact on the cross- sectional relation between return and volatility.
format text
author HAN, Hongchao
author_facet HAN, Hongchao
author_sort HAN, Hongchao
title The Cross-Section of Stock Return and Volatility
title_short The Cross-Section of Stock Return and Volatility
title_full The Cross-Section of Stock Return and Volatility
title_fullStr The Cross-Section of Stock Return and Volatility
title_full_unstemmed The Cross-Section of Stock Return and Volatility
title_sort cross-section of stock return and volatility
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2008
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/etd_coll/41
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1040&context=etd_coll
_version_ 1712300820251279360