To switch or not to switch: Individual differences in executive function and emotion regulation flexibility

Emotion regulation (ER) constitutes strategies that modulate the experience and expression of emotions. While past work has predominantly focused on each ER strategy independently, recent research has begun to examine individual-difference factors that are associated with the flexible implementation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: TOH, Wei Xing
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/etd_coll/334
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1336&context=etd_coll
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.etd_coll-1336
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.etd_coll-13362021-07-27T04:01:38Z To switch or not to switch: Individual differences in executive function and emotion regulation flexibility TOH, Wei Xing Emotion regulation (ER) constitutes strategies that modulate the experience and expression of emotions. While past work has predominantly focused on each ER strategy independently, recent research has begun to examine individual-difference factors that are associated with the flexible implementation of ER strategies in line with environmental demands (i.e., ER flexibility). Considering that ER processes generally implicate executive function (EF)—a collection of adaptive, general-purpose control processes—it is plausible that EF could be involved in ER flexibility. Using a latent-variable approach based on a comprehensive battery of EF tasks, the present study investigated how the various aspects of EF (i.e., common EF, working-memoryspecific, and shifting-specific factors) are related to the flexible maintenance and switching of ER strategies in response to stimuli that elicit varying levels of emotional intensity. Results indicated that better working-memory-specific ability (i.e., the ability to manipulate and update information within a mental workspace) was associated with greater ER strategy variability and higher frequency of ER strategy switching in high-, relative to low-, intensity contexts. Further, more proficient common EF (i.e., the ability to sustain relevant goals in the face of competing goals and responses) corresponded to greater propensity to maintain ER strategy for contexts with low-, but not high-, negative intensity. The outcomes of this study offer a richer understanding of the cognitive mechanisms underlying ER flexibility. 2021-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/etd_coll/334 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1336&context=etd_coll http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Dissertations and Theses Collection (Open Access) eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University executive function inhibition working memory shifting emotion regulation flexibility emotion regulation choice Applied Behavior Analysis Psychology
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic executive function
inhibition
working memory
shifting
emotion regulation flexibility
emotion regulation choice
Applied Behavior Analysis
Psychology
spellingShingle executive function
inhibition
working memory
shifting
emotion regulation flexibility
emotion regulation choice
Applied Behavior Analysis
Psychology
TOH, Wei Xing
To switch or not to switch: Individual differences in executive function and emotion regulation flexibility
description Emotion regulation (ER) constitutes strategies that modulate the experience and expression of emotions. While past work has predominantly focused on each ER strategy independently, recent research has begun to examine individual-difference factors that are associated with the flexible implementation of ER strategies in line with environmental demands (i.e., ER flexibility). Considering that ER processes generally implicate executive function (EF)—a collection of adaptive, general-purpose control processes—it is plausible that EF could be involved in ER flexibility. Using a latent-variable approach based on a comprehensive battery of EF tasks, the present study investigated how the various aspects of EF (i.e., common EF, working-memoryspecific, and shifting-specific factors) are related to the flexible maintenance and switching of ER strategies in response to stimuli that elicit varying levels of emotional intensity. Results indicated that better working-memory-specific ability (i.e., the ability to manipulate and update information within a mental workspace) was associated with greater ER strategy variability and higher frequency of ER strategy switching in high-, relative to low-, intensity contexts. Further, more proficient common EF (i.e., the ability to sustain relevant goals in the face of competing goals and responses) corresponded to greater propensity to maintain ER strategy for contexts with low-, but not high-, negative intensity. The outcomes of this study offer a richer understanding of the cognitive mechanisms underlying ER flexibility.
format text
author TOH, Wei Xing
author_facet TOH, Wei Xing
author_sort TOH, Wei Xing
title To switch or not to switch: Individual differences in executive function and emotion regulation flexibility
title_short To switch or not to switch: Individual differences in executive function and emotion regulation flexibility
title_full To switch or not to switch: Individual differences in executive function and emotion regulation flexibility
title_fullStr To switch or not to switch: Individual differences in executive function and emotion regulation flexibility
title_full_unstemmed To switch or not to switch: Individual differences in executive function and emotion regulation flexibility
title_sort to switch or not to switch: individual differences in executive function and emotion regulation flexibility
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2021
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/etd_coll/334
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1336&context=etd_coll
_version_ 1712300956475981824