Evaluating an institutional repository: A case study of Singapore Management University

An institutional repository (IR) was launched in 2010 for a university in Singapore. The motivations of setting up an IR were to dissemination the research output through open access, to promote the university and researchers, and to help increase their research impact. Some quantitative and qualita...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yeo, Pin Pin
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/library_research/215
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/library_research/article/1220/viewcontent/SJLIM_2023_2_Evaluating_an_institutional_repository.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.library_research-1220
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.library_research-12202023-11-21T08:20:13Z Evaluating an institutional repository: A case study of Singapore Management University Yeo, Pin Pin An institutional repository (IR) was launched in 2010 for a university in Singapore. The motivations of setting up an IR were to dissemination the research output through open access, to promote the university and researchers, and to help increase their research impact. Some quantitative and qualitative performance indicators were selected and used to measure the success of the IR. For the review and the performance indicators, the data used came from the IR at SMU, interviews with faculty members, and a study of a set of journal articles available in the IR to test a hypothesis. The results of the evaluation of the IR using various indicators were presented and the factors that were successful in building the IR were having a workflow process between the research information system and the repository, having effective promotional activities, leveraging on institutional policies and research funder requirements to obtain full text, and proactively searching for full text. Some of the success factors and performance indicators might be of interest to other institutions to consider when implementing and evaluating an IR. 2023-11-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/library_research/215 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/library_research/article/1220/viewcontent/SJLIM_2023_2_Evaluating_an_institutional_repository.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Library eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Institutional repositories academic libraries evaluation performance indicators strategies content recruitment Asian Studies Library and Information Science Scholarly Communication
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Institutional repositories
academic libraries
evaluation
performance indicators
strategies
content recruitment
Asian Studies
Library and Information Science
Scholarly Communication
spellingShingle Institutional repositories
academic libraries
evaluation
performance indicators
strategies
content recruitment
Asian Studies
Library and Information Science
Scholarly Communication
Yeo, Pin Pin
Evaluating an institutional repository: A case study of Singapore Management University
description An institutional repository (IR) was launched in 2010 for a university in Singapore. The motivations of setting up an IR were to dissemination the research output through open access, to promote the university and researchers, and to help increase their research impact. Some quantitative and qualitative performance indicators were selected and used to measure the success of the IR. For the review and the performance indicators, the data used came from the IR at SMU, interviews with faculty members, and a study of a set of journal articles available in the IR to test a hypothesis. The results of the evaluation of the IR using various indicators were presented and the factors that were successful in building the IR were having a workflow process between the research information system and the repository, having effective promotional activities, leveraging on institutional policies and research funder requirements to obtain full text, and proactively searching for full text. Some of the success factors and performance indicators might be of interest to other institutions to consider when implementing and evaluating an IR.
format text
author Yeo, Pin Pin
author_facet Yeo, Pin Pin
author_sort Yeo, Pin Pin
title Evaluating an institutional repository: A case study of Singapore Management University
title_short Evaluating an institutional repository: A case study of Singapore Management University
title_full Evaluating an institutional repository: A case study of Singapore Management University
title_fullStr Evaluating an institutional repository: A case study of Singapore Management University
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating an institutional repository: A case study of Singapore Management University
title_sort evaluating an institutional repository: a case study of singapore management university
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2023
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/library_research/215
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/library_research/article/1220/viewcontent/SJLIM_2023_2_Evaluating_an_institutional_repository.pdf
_version_ 1783955680856637440