Does Idiosyncratic Risk Really Matter?
Goyal and Santa-Clara (2003) find a significantly positive relation between the equal-weighted average stock volatility and the value-weighted portfolio returns on the NYSE/AMEX/Nasdaq stocks for the period of 1963:08 to 1999:12. We show that this result is driven by small stocks traded on the Nasda...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | ZHANG, Zhe (Joe), Bali, Turan G., Cakici, Nusret, Yan, Xuemin |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2005
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/1080 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00750.x |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Does Idiosyncratic Risk Really Matter?
by: ZHANG, Zhe (Joe), et al.
Published: (2003) -
Idiosyncratic Volatility Matters for the Cross-Section of Returns— in More Ways Than One!
by: CHUA, Choong Tze, et al.
Published: (2006) -
Does the Delisting Bias Really Explain the Size Effect?
by: TAN, Eng Joo
Published: (2007) -
Uncertainty Risk and Cross-Sectional Returns: Theory and Evidence
by: ZHANG, Zhe (Joe)
Published: (2003) -
Is a convertible bond call really bad news?
by: EDERINGTON, Louis H., et al.
Published: (2001)