Information and Liquidity Effect of Government Approved Stock Investments

On April 1, 1986, the Singapore government announced that resident investors or Central Provident Fund (CPF) members could use their compulsory savings in the CPF to invest in approved equity stocks, unit trusts, and gold. This policy was implemented on May 1, 1986. However, the list of 70 approved...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lim, Kian Guan, Yeo, W.Y, Wong, K A, Wong, S.C.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 1999
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2269
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0927-538x(99)00017-7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-3268
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-32682010-09-23T12:30:04Z Information and Liquidity Effect of Government Approved Stock Investments Lim, Kian Guan Yeo, W.Y Wong, K A Wong, S.C. On April 1, 1986, the Singapore government announced that resident investors or Central Provident Fund (CPF) members could use their compulsory savings in the CPF to invest in approved equity stocks, unit trusts, and gold. This policy was implemented on May 1, 1986. However, the list of 70 approved trustee stocks in which CPF members may invest their funds was not released until May 3, 1986. This paper studies the economic impact of the event of releasing the list of 70 approved trustee stocks on the returns of both the approved and the non-approved stocks. Two possible impact are suggested, namely the information effect and the liquidity constraint effect. A multivariate regression model as well as a traditional event study time series model are used to test for the presence of the two effects. We test for both the partial information release on April 1, and also the full information release on May 3. The results show that significant information effect was not present. However, there is evidence that liquidity constraint did exist before May 1, 1986. The paper draws two implications which may be useful to policymakers. Firstly, the releasing of information in stages can effectively reduce informational impact on the stock market. Secondly, the existence of a liquidity constraint implies that compulsory saving schemes may cause investors, the savers, to hold more riskfree assets than they really desire. 1999-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2269 info:doi/10.1016/s0927-538x(99)00017-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0927-538x(99)00017-7 Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Business
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Business
spellingShingle Business
Lim, Kian Guan
Yeo, W.Y
Wong, K A
Wong, S.C.
Information and Liquidity Effect of Government Approved Stock Investments
description On April 1, 1986, the Singapore government announced that resident investors or Central Provident Fund (CPF) members could use their compulsory savings in the CPF to invest in approved equity stocks, unit trusts, and gold. This policy was implemented on May 1, 1986. However, the list of 70 approved trustee stocks in which CPF members may invest their funds was not released until May 3, 1986. This paper studies the economic impact of the event of releasing the list of 70 approved trustee stocks on the returns of both the approved and the non-approved stocks. Two possible impact are suggested, namely the information effect and the liquidity constraint effect. A multivariate regression model as well as a traditional event study time series model are used to test for the presence of the two effects. We test for both the partial information release on April 1, and also the full information release on May 3. The results show that significant information effect was not present. However, there is evidence that liquidity constraint did exist before May 1, 1986. The paper draws two implications which may be useful to policymakers. Firstly, the releasing of information in stages can effectively reduce informational impact on the stock market. Secondly, the existence of a liquidity constraint implies that compulsory saving schemes may cause investors, the savers, to hold more riskfree assets than they really desire.
format text
author Lim, Kian Guan
Yeo, W.Y
Wong, K A
Wong, S.C.
author_facet Lim, Kian Guan
Yeo, W.Y
Wong, K A
Wong, S.C.
author_sort Lim, Kian Guan
title Information and Liquidity Effect of Government Approved Stock Investments
title_short Information and Liquidity Effect of Government Approved Stock Investments
title_full Information and Liquidity Effect of Government Approved Stock Investments
title_fullStr Information and Liquidity Effect of Government Approved Stock Investments
title_full_unstemmed Information and Liquidity Effect of Government Approved Stock Investments
title_sort information and liquidity effect of government approved stock investments
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 1999
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2269
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0927-538x(99)00017-7
_version_ 1770570191126659072