Why Change a Good Thing? The Liability of Inertia
Institutional and ecological theories of organizations are consistently being seen as complementary rather than opposing perspectives. Both theories support the viewpoint that change is often detrimental to organizations. However, within institutional theory a lack of change can also be seen as a li...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2442 https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.195.1321 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-3441 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-34412010-09-24T04:18:03Z Why Change a Good Thing? The Liability of Inertia BROWN, Graham Langton, N. Read, M Institutional and ecological theories of organizations are consistently being seen as complementary rather than opposing perspectives. Both theories support the viewpoint that change is often detrimental to organizations. However, within institutional theory a lack of change can also be seen as a liability. To the extent that organizations do not change when their stakeholders change, they may face a ôliability of inertiaö. 2010-05-20T07:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2442 https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.195.1321 Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Organizational Behavior and Theory |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Organizational Behavior and Theory |
spellingShingle |
Organizational Behavior and Theory BROWN, Graham Langton, N. Read, M Why Change a Good Thing? The Liability of Inertia |
description |
Institutional and ecological theories of organizations are consistently being seen as complementary rather than opposing perspectives. Both theories support the viewpoint that change is often detrimental to organizations. However, within institutional theory a lack of change can also be seen as a liability. To the extent that organizations do not change when their stakeholders change, they may face a ôliability of inertiaö. |
format |
text |
author |
BROWN, Graham Langton, N. Read, M |
author_facet |
BROWN, Graham Langton, N. Read, M |
author_sort |
BROWN, Graham |
title |
Why Change a Good Thing? The Liability of Inertia |
title_short |
Why Change a Good Thing? The Liability of Inertia |
title_full |
Why Change a Good Thing? The Liability of Inertia |
title_fullStr |
Why Change a Good Thing? The Liability of Inertia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why Change a Good Thing? The Liability of Inertia |
title_sort |
why change a good thing? the liability of inertia |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2442 https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.195.1321 |
_version_ |
1770570264673779712 |