Searching for competitive advantage in the black box

This paper deals with the sources of potential competitive advantage. It builds upon previous work by Flamholtz (1995) to develop a model of the determinants of organizational success and failure as well as subsequent empirical studies of the link between the model and financial performance (Flamhol...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: FLAMHOLTZ, Eric, HUA, Wei
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2530
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/3529/viewcontent/1_s2.0_S0263237303000173_main.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-3529
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-35292022-05-17T06:10:21Z Searching for competitive advantage in the black box FLAMHOLTZ, Eric HUA, Wei This paper deals with the sources of potential competitive advantage. It builds upon previous work by Flamholtz (1995) to develop a model of the determinants of organizational success and failure as well as subsequent empirical studies of the link between the model and financial performance (Flamholtz and Aksehirli, 2000, Flamholtz and Hua, 2002. The paper discusses the extension of the model from a framework for organizational development to a framework or ‘lens’ for building competitive advantage. It also hypothesizes that an organization’s infrastructure (defined in terms of four of the model’s variables) are likely to be the true source of sustainable competitive advantage. Data originally collected for the study reported in Flamholtz and Aksehirli to test the relation between the model and financial performance was utilized to test hypotheses concerning the model and competitive success and sources of competitive advantage. Some of the data derived from the prior study by Flamholtz and Aksehirli, which has not been previously analyzed or reported, was used to identify empirically the sources of competitive advantage, and, in turn, test the hypothesis about the role of infrastructure as the true source of sustainable competitive advantage. Two different statistical methods were used to analyze the hypothesized relationship between the variables included in the Pyramid of Organizational Development and competitive success: (1) the Friedman two-way analysis of variance by ranks and (2) regression analysis. SPSS statistical software was used for both analyses. Results of the Friedman test indicate that ROE scores are significantly associated with total Pyramid of Organizational Development scores. At the significance level of 0.005, higher values of total scores are connected with higher ROE values, and lower total scores are linked with lower ROEs [Siegel (1956)]. To address the issue of the Sources of Potential Strategic Advantage we performed an analysis of the data on strategic organizational development scores shown below in Figure 4 to determine which of the six key variables comprising the Pyramid of Organizational Development actually differentiated one firm from another. As hypothesized, we found different frequencies or proportions of the variables comprising the Pyramid of Organizational Development. We also tested the hypothesis that the key sources of competitive advantage are a firm’s infrastructure, rather than its choice of markets and its products, using the Cochran Q Test. The results of this test indicate that the proportions of competitive advantages of each matched pair do differ significantly among the different sources of potential competitive advantages, at a significance level of 0.028. In addition, to test the hypothesis that infrastructure is significantly different from markets and products, we performed a Friedman Two Way Analysis of Variance. This test was significant at 0.014. The empirical analysis above shows a clear relationship between the Pyramid of Organizational Development framework and competitive advantage. This has several significant implications for practicing managers and researchers. 2010-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2530 info:doi/10.1016/s0263-2373(03)00017-3 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/3529/viewcontent/1_s2.0_S0263237303000173_main.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Organizational development Competitive advantage Organizational infrastructure Strategic building blocks Financial success Business
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Organizational development
Competitive advantage
Organizational infrastructure
Strategic building blocks
Financial success
Business
spellingShingle Organizational development
Competitive advantage
Organizational infrastructure
Strategic building blocks
Financial success
Business
FLAMHOLTZ, Eric
HUA, Wei
Searching for competitive advantage in the black box
description This paper deals with the sources of potential competitive advantage. It builds upon previous work by Flamholtz (1995) to develop a model of the determinants of organizational success and failure as well as subsequent empirical studies of the link between the model and financial performance (Flamholtz and Aksehirli, 2000, Flamholtz and Hua, 2002. The paper discusses the extension of the model from a framework for organizational development to a framework or ‘lens’ for building competitive advantage. It also hypothesizes that an organization’s infrastructure (defined in terms of four of the model’s variables) are likely to be the true source of sustainable competitive advantage. Data originally collected for the study reported in Flamholtz and Aksehirli to test the relation between the model and financial performance was utilized to test hypotheses concerning the model and competitive success and sources of competitive advantage. Some of the data derived from the prior study by Flamholtz and Aksehirli, which has not been previously analyzed or reported, was used to identify empirically the sources of competitive advantage, and, in turn, test the hypothesis about the role of infrastructure as the true source of sustainable competitive advantage. Two different statistical methods were used to analyze the hypothesized relationship between the variables included in the Pyramid of Organizational Development and competitive success: (1) the Friedman two-way analysis of variance by ranks and (2) regression analysis. SPSS statistical software was used for both analyses. Results of the Friedman test indicate that ROE scores are significantly associated with total Pyramid of Organizational Development scores. At the significance level of 0.005, higher values of total scores are connected with higher ROE values, and lower total scores are linked with lower ROEs [Siegel (1956)]. To address the issue of the Sources of Potential Strategic Advantage we performed an analysis of the data on strategic organizational development scores shown below in Figure 4 to determine which of the six key variables comprising the Pyramid of Organizational Development actually differentiated one firm from another. As hypothesized, we found different frequencies or proportions of the variables comprising the Pyramid of Organizational Development. We also tested the hypothesis that the key sources of competitive advantage are a firm’s infrastructure, rather than its choice of markets and its products, using the Cochran Q Test. The results of this test indicate that the proportions of competitive advantages of each matched pair do differ significantly among the different sources of potential competitive advantages, at a significance level of 0.028. In addition, to test the hypothesis that infrastructure is significantly different from markets and products, we performed a Friedman Two Way Analysis of Variance. This test was significant at 0.014. The empirical analysis above shows a clear relationship between the Pyramid of Organizational Development framework and competitive advantage. This has several significant implications for practicing managers and researchers.
format text
author FLAMHOLTZ, Eric
HUA, Wei
author_facet FLAMHOLTZ, Eric
HUA, Wei
author_sort FLAMHOLTZ, Eric
title Searching for competitive advantage in the black box
title_short Searching for competitive advantage in the black box
title_full Searching for competitive advantage in the black box
title_fullStr Searching for competitive advantage in the black box
title_full_unstemmed Searching for competitive advantage in the black box
title_sort searching for competitive advantage in the black box
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2010
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/2530
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/3529/viewcontent/1_s2.0_S0263237303000173_main.pdf
_version_ 1770570310490259456