The effects of action, normality, and decision carefulness on anticipated regret: Evidence for a broad mediating role of decision justifiability.
Two distinct theoretical views explain the effects of action/inaction and social normality on anticipated regret. Norm theory (Kahneman & Miller, 1986) emphasises the role of decision mutability, the ease with which one can imagine having made a different choice. Decision justification theory (C...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3053 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4052/viewcontent/Effects_of_action_normality.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-4052 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-40522020-01-11T09:21:08Z The effects of action, normality, and decision carefulness on anticipated regret: Evidence for a broad mediating role of decision justifiability. REB, Jochen CONNOLLY, Terry Two distinct theoretical views explain the effects of action/inaction and social normality on anticipated regret. Norm theory (Kahneman & Miller, 1986) emphasises the role of decision mutability, the ease with which one can imagine having made a different choice. Decision justification theory (Connolly & Zeelenberg, 2002) highlights the role of decision justifiability, the perception that the choice was made on a defensible basis, supported by convincing arguments or using a thoughtful, comprehensive decision process. The present paper tests several contrasting predictions from the two theoretical approaches in a series of four studies. Study 1 replicated earlier findings showing greater anticipated regret when the chosen option was abnormal than when it was normal, and perceived justifiability mediated the effect. Study 2 showed that anticipated regret was higher for careless than for careful decisions. Study 3 replicated this finding for a sample holding a different social norm towards the focal decision. Finally, Study 4 found that, when decision carefulness, normality and action/inaction were all specified, only the former showed a significant effect on anticipated regret, and the effect was again mediated by perceived justifiability. Decision justification theory thus appears to provide a better account of anticipated regret intensity in this context than does norm theory. 2010-12-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3053 info:doi/10.1080/02699930903512168 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4052/viewcontent/Effects_of_action_normality.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Anticipated regret Decision process carefulness Justifiability Normality Regret aversion Cognition and Perception Organizational Behavior and Theory |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Anticipated regret Decision process carefulness Justifiability Normality Regret aversion Cognition and Perception Organizational Behavior and Theory |
spellingShingle |
Anticipated regret Decision process carefulness Justifiability Normality Regret aversion Cognition and Perception Organizational Behavior and Theory REB, Jochen CONNOLLY, Terry The effects of action, normality, and decision carefulness on anticipated regret: Evidence for a broad mediating role of decision justifiability. |
description |
Two distinct theoretical views explain the effects of action/inaction and social normality on anticipated regret. Norm theory (Kahneman & Miller, 1986) emphasises the role of decision mutability, the ease with which one can imagine having made a different choice. Decision justification theory (Connolly & Zeelenberg, 2002) highlights the role of decision justifiability, the perception that the choice was made on a defensible basis, supported by convincing arguments or using a thoughtful, comprehensive decision process. The present paper tests several contrasting predictions from the two theoretical approaches in a series of four studies. Study 1 replicated earlier findings showing greater anticipated regret when the chosen option was abnormal than when it was normal, and perceived justifiability mediated the effect. Study 2 showed that anticipated regret was higher for careless than for careful decisions. Study 3 replicated this finding for a sample holding a different social norm towards the focal decision. Finally, Study 4 found that, when decision carefulness, normality and action/inaction were all specified, only the former showed a significant effect on anticipated regret, and the effect was again mediated by perceived justifiability. Decision justification theory thus appears to provide a better account of anticipated regret intensity in this context than does norm theory. |
format |
text |
author |
REB, Jochen CONNOLLY, Terry |
author_facet |
REB, Jochen CONNOLLY, Terry |
author_sort |
REB, Jochen |
title |
The effects of action, normality, and decision carefulness on anticipated regret: Evidence for a broad mediating role of decision justifiability. |
title_short |
The effects of action, normality, and decision carefulness on anticipated regret: Evidence for a broad mediating role of decision justifiability. |
title_full |
The effects of action, normality, and decision carefulness on anticipated regret: Evidence for a broad mediating role of decision justifiability. |
title_fullStr |
The effects of action, normality, and decision carefulness on anticipated regret: Evidence for a broad mediating role of decision justifiability. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The effects of action, normality, and decision carefulness on anticipated regret: Evidence for a broad mediating role of decision justifiability. |
title_sort |
effects of action, normality, and decision carefulness on anticipated regret: evidence for a broad mediating role of decision justifiability. |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3053 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4052/viewcontent/Effects_of_action_normality.pdf |
_version_ |
1770570949902467072 |