The effects of action, normality, and decision carefulness on anticipated regret: Evidence for a broad mediating role of decision justifiability.

Two distinct theoretical views explain the effects of action/inaction and social normality on anticipated regret. Norm theory (Kahneman & Miller, 1986) emphasises the role of decision mutability, the ease with which one can imagine having made a different choice. Decision justification theory (C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: REB, Jochen, CONNOLLY, Terry
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3053
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4052/viewcontent/Effects_of_action_normality.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-4052
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-40522020-01-11T09:21:08Z The effects of action, normality, and decision carefulness on anticipated regret: Evidence for a broad mediating role of decision justifiability. REB, Jochen CONNOLLY, Terry Two distinct theoretical views explain the effects of action/inaction and social normality on anticipated regret. Norm theory (Kahneman & Miller, 1986) emphasises the role of decision mutability, the ease with which one can imagine having made a different choice. Decision justification theory (Connolly & Zeelenberg, 2002) highlights the role of decision justifiability, the perception that the choice was made on a defensible basis, supported by convincing arguments or using a thoughtful, comprehensive decision process. The present paper tests several contrasting predictions from the two theoretical approaches in a series of four studies. Study 1 replicated earlier findings showing greater anticipated regret when the chosen option was abnormal than when it was normal, and perceived justifiability mediated the effect. Study 2 showed that anticipated regret was higher for careless than for careful decisions. Study 3 replicated this finding for a sample holding a different social norm towards the focal decision. Finally, Study 4 found that, when decision carefulness, normality and action/inaction were all specified, only the former showed a significant effect on anticipated regret, and the effect was again mediated by perceived justifiability. Decision justification theory thus appears to provide a better account of anticipated regret intensity in this context than does norm theory. 2010-12-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3053 info:doi/10.1080/02699930903512168 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4052/viewcontent/Effects_of_action_normality.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Anticipated regret Decision process carefulness Justifiability Normality Regret aversion Cognition and Perception Organizational Behavior and Theory
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Anticipated regret
Decision process carefulness
Justifiability
Normality
Regret aversion
Cognition and Perception
Organizational Behavior and Theory
spellingShingle Anticipated regret
Decision process carefulness
Justifiability
Normality
Regret aversion
Cognition and Perception
Organizational Behavior and Theory
REB, Jochen
CONNOLLY, Terry
The effects of action, normality, and decision carefulness on anticipated regret: Evidence for a broad mediating role of decision justifiability.
description Two distinct theoretical views explain the effects of action/inaction and social normality on anticipated regret. Norm theory (Kahneman & Miller, 1986) emphasises the role of decision mutability, the ease with which one can imagine having made a different choice. Decision justification theory (Connolly & Zeelenberg, 2002) highlights the role of decision justifiability, the perception that the choice was made on a defensible basis, supported by convincing arguments or using a thoughtful, comprehensive decision process. The present paper tests several contrasting predictions from the two theoretical approaches in a series of four studies. Study 1 replicated earlier findings showing greater anticipated regret when the chosen option was abnormal than when it was normal, and perceived justifiability mediated the effect. Study 2 showed that anticipated regret was higher for careless than for careful decisions. Study 3 replicated this finding for a sample holding a different social norm towards the focal decision. Finally, Study 4 found that, when decision carefulness, normality and action/inaction were all specified, only the former showed a significant effect on anticipated regret, and the effect was again mediated by perceived justifiability. Decision justification theory thus appears to provide a better account of anticipated regret intensity in this context than does norm theory.
format text
author REB, Jochen
CONNOLLY, Terry
author_facet REB, Jochen
CONNOLLY, Terry
author_sort REB, Jochen
title The effects of action, normality, and decision carefulness on anticipated regret: Evidence for a broad mediating role of decision justifiability.
title_short The effects of action, normality, and decision carefulness on anticipated regret: Evidence for a broad mediating role of decision justifiability.
title_full The effects of action, normality, and decision carefulness on anticipated regret: Evidence for a broad mediating role of decision justifiability.
title_fullStr The effects of action, normality, and decision carefulness on anticipated regret: Evidence for a broad mediating role of decision justifiability.
title_full_unstemmed The effects of action, normality, and decision carefulness on anticipated regret: Evidence for a broad mediating role of decision justifiability.
title_sort effects of action, normality, and decision carefulness on anticipated regret: evidence for a broad mediating role of decision justifiability.
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2010
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3053
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4052/viewcontent/Effects_of_action_normality.pdf
_version_ 1770570949902467072