Do Banks Monitor Corporate Decisions? Evidence from Bank Financing of Mergers and Acquisitions

We examine whether banks, in providing financing for the deals, monitor firms mergers and acquisitions to the extent that will benefit acquirers shareholders. Inconsistent with the conventional theoretical argument, we do not find that bank-financed deals are associated with better stock or accounti...

全面介紹

Saved in:
書目詳細資料
Main Authors: HUANG, Sheng, LU, Ruichang, Srinivasan, Anand
格式: text
語言:English
出版: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2013
主題:
在線閱讀:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/3730
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/4729/viewcontent/HuangSRLU_WP3_MA_banking.pdf
標簽: 添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
機構: Singapore Management University
語言: English
實物特徵
總結:We examine whether banks, in providing financing for the deals, monitor firms mergers and acquisitions to the extent that will benefit acquirers shareholders. Inconsistent with the conventional theoretical argument, we do not find that bank-financed deals are associated with better stock or accounting performance than bond-financed deals or deals paid with internal cash. There is strong evidence instead that banks tighten up the loan contract terms in financing the deals, such as cutting short the loan maturity and imposing higher collateral requirement and more covenant restrictions. However, bank-financed deals are more likely to be terminated when they experience more negative stock market reactions to deal announcements, suggesting that banks may be subject to the pressure of shareholder dissent. Overall, our results suggest that banks do not monitor to enhance firm value but rather protect themselves from downside risks through more stringent loan contract terms. This study highlights the passive role of banks in corporate decisions outside of credit default states and covenant violations.