Impact of component supplier branding on profitability
In recent years, many business-to-business (B2B) component supplier (CS) firms have added branding to their marketing toolbox. By extending the logic of ingredient branding to B2B components, they aim to create “pull” from B2B end customers by building a strong CS brand image among their customers...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4123 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/5122/viewcontent/ImpactComponentSupplierBrandingProfitability_av.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-5122 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-51222021-05-25T13:29:24Z Impact of component supplier branding on profitability WORM, Stefan SRIVASTAVA, Rajendra K. In recent years, many business-to-business (B2B) component supplier (CS) firms have added branding to their marketing toolbox. By extending the logic of ingredient branding to B2B components, they aim to create “pull” from B2B end customers by building a strong CS brand image among their customers' customers. In contrast with the established “push” approach of building strong relationships with original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), it is unclear whether and under which conditions CS branding is a worthy strategy. On the one hand, anecdotal evidence suggests that suppliers can leverage strong CS brand image in negotiations with increasingly powerful OEMs to enhance their financial performance. On the other hand, many B2B managers believe that branding does not work in their industry context and erodes profitability. We build a data set consisting of survey measures and archival data across a broad set of industries. Our results indicate that the financial outcomes of CS branding largely depend on the characteristics of the CS and OEM industries. Unlike dyadic OEM–CS relationships, which enhance profitability invariably across industry contexts, CS branding is effective only in well-defined situations. CS branding initiatives can enhance return in CS industries with substantial levels of product differentiation and technology intensity. However, unfavorable results may arise in industry contexts in which OEM–end customer relationships or OEM brands are important. 2014-07-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4123 info:doi/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2014.05.005 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/5122/viewcontent/ImpactComponentSupplierBrandingProfitability_av.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Business-to-business brands Ingredient branding Component supplier branding Brand performance Financial performance Marketing Operations and Supply Chain Management |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Business-to-business brands Ingredient branding Component supplier branding Brand performance Financial performance Marketing Operations and Supply Chain Management |
spellingShingle |
Business-to-business brands Ingredient branding Component supplier branding Brand performance Financial performance Marketing Operations and Supply Chain Management WORM, Stefan SRIVASTAVA, Rajendra K. Impact of component supplier branding on profitability |
description |
In recent years, many business-to-business (B2B) component supplier (CS) firms have added branding to their marketing toolbox. By extending the logic of ingredient branding to B2B components, they aim to create “pull” from B2B end customers by building a strong CS brand image among their customers' customers. In contrast with the established “push” approach of building strong relationships with original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), it is unclear whether and under which conditions CS branding is a worthy strategy. On the one hand, anecdotal evidence suggests that suppliers can leverage strong CS brand image in negotiations with increasingly powerful OEMs to enhance their financial performance. On the other hand, many B2B managers believe that branding does not work in their industry context and erodes profitability. We build a data set consisting of survey measures and archival data across a broad set of industries. Our results indicate that the financial outcomes of CS branding largely depend on the characteristics of the CS and OEM industries. Unlike dyadic OEM–CS relationships, which enhance profitability invariably across industry contexts, CS branding is effective only in well-defined situations. CS branding initiatives can enhance return in CS industries with substantial levels of product differentiation and technology intensity. However, unfavorable results may arise in industry contexts in which OEM–end customer relationships or OEM brands are important. |
format |
text |
author |
WORM, Stefan SRIVASTAVA, Rajendra K. |
author_facet |
WORM, Stefan SRIVASTAVA, Rajendra K. |
author_sort |
WORM, Stefan |
title |
Impact of component supplier branding on profitability |
title_short |
Impact of component supplier branding on profitability |
title_full |
Impact of component supplier branding on profitability |
title_fullStr |
Impact of component supplier branding on profitability |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of component supplier branding on profitability |
title_sort |
impact of component supplier branding on profitability |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4123 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/5122/viewcontent/ImpactComponentSupplierBrandingProfitability_av.pdf |
_version_ |
1770572039512391680 |