Impact of component supplier branding on profitability

In recent years, many business-to-business (B2B) component supplier (CS) firms have added branding to their marketing toolbox. By extending the logic of ingredient branding to B2B components, they aim to create “pull” from B2B end customers by building a strong CS brand image among their customers&#...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: WORM, Stefan, SRIVASTAVA, Rajendra K.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4123
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/5122/viewcontent/ImpactComponentSupplierBrandingProfitability_av.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-5122
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-51222021-05-25T13:29:24Z Impact of component supplier branding on profitability WORM, Stefan SRIVASTAVA, Rajendra K. In recent years, many business-to-business (B2B) component supplier (CS) firms have added branding to their marketing toolbox. By extending the logic of ingredient branding to B2B components, they aim to create “pull” from B2B end customers by building a strong CS brand image among their customers' customers. In contrast with the established “push” approach of building strong relationships with original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), it is unclear whether and under which conditions CS branding is a worthy strategy. On the one hand, anecdotal evidence suggests that suppliers can leverage strong CS brand image in negotiations with increasingly powerful OEMs to enhance their financial performance. On the other hand, many B2B managers believe that branding does not work in their industry context and erodes profitability. We build a data set consisting of survey measures and archival data across a broad set of industries. Our results indicate that the financial outcomes of CS branding largely depend on the characteristics of the CS and OEM industries. Unlike dyadic OEM–CS relationships, which enhance profitability invariably across industry contexts, CS branding is effective only in well-defined situations. CS branding initiatives can enhance return in CS industries with substantial levels of product differentiation and technology intensity. However, unfavorable results may arise in industry contexts in which OEM–end customer relationships or OEM brands are important. 2014-07-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4123 info:doi/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2014.05.005 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/5122/viewcontent/ImpactComponentSupplierBrandingProfitability_av.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Business-to-business brands Ingredient branding Component supplier branding Brand performance Financial performance Marketing Operations and Supply Chain Management
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Business-to-business brands
Ingredient branding
Component supplier branding
Brand performance
Financial performance
Marketing
Operations and Supply Chain Management
spellingShingle Business-to-business brands
Ingredient branding
Component supplier branding
Brand performance
Financial performance
Marketing
Operations and Supply Chain Management
WORM, Stefan
SRIVASTAVA, Rajendra K.
Impact of component supplier branding on profitability
description In recent years, many business-to-business (B2B) component supplier (CS) firms have added branding to their marketing toolbox. By extending the logic of ingredient branding to B2B components, they aim to create “pull” from B2B end customers by building a strong CS brand image among their customers' customers. In contrast with the established “push” approach of building strong relationships with original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), it is unclear whether and under which conditions CS branding is a worthy strategy. On the one hand, anecdotal evidence suggests that suppliers can leverage strong CS brand image in negotiations with increasingly powerful OEMs to enhance their financial performance. On the other hand, many B2B managers believe that branding does not work in their industry context and erodes profitability. We build a data set consisting of survey measures and archival data across a broad set of industries. Our results indicate that the financial outcomes of CS branding largely depend on the characteristics of the CS and OEM industries. Unlike dyadic OEM–CS relationships, which enhance profitability invariably across industry contexts, CS branding is effective only in well-defined situations. CS branding initiatives can enhance return in CS industries with substantial levels of product differentiation and technology intensity. However, unfavorable results may arise in industry contexts in which OEM–end customer relationships or OEM brands are important.
format text
author WORM, Stefan
SRIVASTAVA, Rajendra K.
author_facet WORM, Stefan
SRIVASTAVA, Rajendra K.
author_sort WORM, Stefan
title Impact of component supplier branding on profitability
title_short Impact of component supplier branding on profitability
title_full Impact of component supplier branding on profitability
title_fullStr Impact of component supplier branding on profitability
title_full_unstemmed Impact of component supplier branding on profitability
title_sort impact of component supplier branding on profitability
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2014
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4123
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/5122/viewcontent/ImpactComponentSupplierBrandingProfitability_av.pdf
_version_ 1770572039512391680