Voting Control in German Corporations

Corporate control in Germany has received considerable attention in the law and economics literature. However, the absence of disclosure provisions comparable to those of the Williams Act in the United States limited the informativeness of empirical studies. The recent transposition of the European...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: BOEHMER, Ekkehart, Becht, Marco
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4653
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(03)00011-5
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-5652
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-56522016-03-05T14:58:17Z Voting Control in German Corporations BOEHMER, Ekkehart Becht, Marco Corporate control in Germany has received considerable attention in the law and economics literature. However, the absence of disclosure provisions comparable to those of the Williams Act in the United States limited the informativeness of empirical studies. The recent transposition of the European Union’s Large Holdings Directive into German law allows us, for the first time, to analyze the voting power of blockholders in detail. We document that voting control is generally highly concentrated: about 82% of officially listed AGs have a minority blockholder (controlling more than 25% of the votes) and 65% are majority controlled. Blocks are clearly aligned with important control thresholds (25, 50, and 75%). We further show that important disclosure gaps remain. Banks (and other custodians) are exempt from disclosing the voting power they might derive from proxies or through their investment companies. As a result, banks and insurance companies only partially disclose the power they might have over blockholders and listed companies with (apparently) no blockholders. Finally, we provide a case-by-case analysis of disclosure filings and document the shortcomings of the new standard. Our findings suggest that corporate control is even more concentrated and that the influence of management-controlled entities is even larger than the disclosed voting-block statistics. 2003-03-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4653 info:doi/10.1016/S0144-8188(03)00011-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(03)00011-5 Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Voting-block statistics Blockholders Corporate control Business Corporate Finance Strategic Management Policy
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Voting-block statistics
Blockholders
Corporate control
Business
Corporate Finance
Strategic Management Policy
spellingShingle Voting-block statistics
Blockholders
Corporate control
Business
Corporate Finance
Strategic Management Policy
BOEHMER, Ekkehart
Becht, Marco
Voting Control in German Corporations
description Corporate control in Germany has received considerable attention in the law and economics literature. However, the absence of disclosure provisions comparable to those of the Williams Act in the United States limited the informativeness of empirical studies. The recent transposition of the European Union’s Large Holdings Directive into German law allows us, for the first time, to analyze the voting power of blockholders in detail. We document that voting control is generally highly concentrated: about 82% of officially listed AGs have a minority blockholder (controlling more than 25% of the votes) and 65% are majority controlled. Blocks are clearly aligned with important control thresholds (25, 50, and 75%). We further show that important disclosure gaps remain. Banks (and other custodians) are exempt from disclosing the voting power they might derive from proxies or through their investment companies. As a result, banks and insurance companies only partially disclose the power they might have over blockholders and listed companies with (apparently) no blockholders. Finally, we provide a case-by-case analysis of disclosure filings and document the shortcomings of the new standard. Our findings suggest that corporate control is even more concentrated and that the influence of management-controlled entities is even larger than the disclosed voting-block statistics.
format text
author BOEHMER, Ekkehart
Becht, Marco
author_facet BOEHMER, Ekkehart
Becht, Marco
author_sort BOEHMER, Ekkehart
title Voting Control in German Corporations
title_short Voting Control in German Corporations
title_full Voting Control in German Corporations
title_fullStr Voting Control in German Corporations
title_full_unstemmed Voting Control in German Corporations
title_sort voting control in german corporations
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2003
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4653
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(03)00011-5
_version_ 1770572378075561984