Expanding Context to Redefine Theories: Africa in Management Research
As a scholarly field matures, theories emerge that guide paradigms and shape consensus in academic discourse. Management theories reflect a shared consensus on how individual behaviors or organizational actions result in a certain set of outcomes and under specific conditions. Clearly, theory is par...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4759 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/5758/viewcontent/ExpandingContextRedefineTheories_2015.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-5758 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-57582020-01-14T06:45:57Z Expanding Context to Redefine Theories: Africa in Management Research GEORGE, Gerard As a scholarly field matures, theories emerge that guide paradigms and shape consensus in academic discourse. Management theories reflect a shared consensus on how individual behaviors or organizational actions result in a certain set of outcomes and under specific conditions. Clearly, theory is paramount to guiding whether models of potential relationships bear out and how and why we would expect a relationship or specific outcome. Yet much of this theory is derived from cumulative empirical evidence from a ‘context’ that has remained a silent partner in our quest for a theoretical contribution. A growing number of papers emphasize the theoretical contribution as disembodied from the context in which the empirical evidence of a causal relationship was gleaned. As an applied field, the emphasis on theory with disregard to the context of management practice presents a challenge for progress both as a scholarly domain and for credibility in what we teach and how we consult, or how we effect positive social change. This guest editorial joins a chorus of recent editorials in this journal (e.g., Tsui, 2013) and elsewhere (e.g., George, 2014) that suggest we rethink management scholarship, rejuvenate our ideas for research, and embed a nugget of practice in scholarly discourse. 2015-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4759 info:doi/10.1017/mor.2015.7 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/5758/viewcontent/ExpandingContextRedefineTheories_2015.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University African Studies Strategic Management Policy |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
African Studies Strategic Management Policy |
spellingShingle |
African Studies Strategic Management Policy GEORGE, Gerard Expanding Context to Redefine Theories: Africa in Management Research |
description |
As a scholarly field matures, theories emerge that guide paradigms and shape consensus in academic discourse. Management theories reflect a shared consensus on how individual behaviors or organizational actions result in a certain set of outcomes and under specific conditions. Clearly, theory is paramount to guiding whether models of potential relationships bear out and how and why we would expect a relationship or specific outcome. Yet much of this theory is derived from cumulative empirical evidence from a ‘context’ that has remained a silent partner in our quest for a theoretical contribution. A growing number of papers emphasize the theoretical contribution as disembodied from the context in which the empirical evidence of a causal relationship was gleaned. As an applied field, the emphasis on theory with disregard to the context of management practice presents a challenge for progress both as a scholarly domain and for credibility in what we teach and how we consult, or how we effect positive social change. This guest editorial joins a chorus of recent editorials in this journal (e.g., Tsui, 2013) and elsewhere (e.g., George, 2014) that suggest we rethink management scholarship, rejuvenate our ideas for research, and embed a nugget of practice in scholarly discourse. |
format |
text |
author |
GEORGE, Gerard |
author_facet |
GEORGE, Gerard |
author_sort |
GEORGE, Gerard |
title |
Expanding Context to Redefine Theories: Africa in Management Research |
title_short |
Expanding Context to Redefine Theories: Africa in Management Research |
title_full |
Expanding Context to Redefine Theories: Africa in Management Research |
title_fullStr |
Expanding Context to Redefine Theories: Africa in Management Research |
title_full_unstemmed |
Expanding Context to Redefine Theories: Africa in Management Research |
title_sort |
expanding context to redefine theories: africa in management research |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/4759 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/5758/viewcontent/ExpandingContextRedefineTheories_2015.pdf |
_version_ |
1770572655481585664 |