Exploring the universality of personality judgments: Evidence from the great transformation (1000 BCE–200 BCE)
We examined whether personality judgments were present in texts of the diverse religious and philosophical traditions that emerged during the Great Transformation, an era spanning roughly 1000 BCE to 200 BCE. Some psychologists have suggested that the tendency of humans to judge personality has evol...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5300 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-6299 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-62992017-10-06T07:30:14Z Exploring the universality of personality judgments: Evidence from the great transformation (1000 BCE–200 BCE) LIN, Stephanie C. LIN, Stephanie C. KOROGODSKY, Maria We examined whether personality judgments were present in texts of the diverse religious and philosophical traditions that emerged during the Great Transformation, an era spanning roughly 1000 BCE to 200 BCE. Some psychologists have suggested that the tendency of humans to judge personality has evolved; if some ancient societies failed to record personality judgments, it would be evidence against such an evolutionary position. In addition, learning about the prevalence and specifics of ancient personality judgments can help psychologists better understand the prehistory of personality psychology. Eight cultural traditions were studied: two each from China (Confucianism, Taoism), Greece (Classical and Hellenistic philosophy), India (Buddhism, Hinduism), and the Middle East (Judaism, Zoroastrianism). We found evidence that personality judgments were an important aspect of all of these traditions. Not only did people judge one another, but they also offered instructions on how to judge others. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) 2011-03-01T08:00:00Z text https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5300 info:doi/10.1037/a0020711 Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University History of psychology Judgmentalism Person perception Personality Cognition and Perception Industrial and Organizational Psychology Personality and Social Contexts |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
History of psychology Judgmentalism Person perception Personality Cognition and Perception Industrial and Organizational Psychology Personality and Social Contexts |
spellingShingle |
History of psychology Judgmentalism Person perception Personality Cognition and Perception Industrial and Organizational Psychology Personality and Social Contexts LIN, Stephanie C. LIN, Stephanie C. KOROGODSKY, Maria Exploring the universality of personality judgments: Evidence from the great transformation (1000 BCE–200 BCE) |
description |
We examined whether personality judgments were present in texts of the diverse religious and philosophical traditions that emerged during the Great Transformation, an era spanning roughly 1000 BCE to 200 BCE. Some psychologists have suggested that the tendency of humans to judge personality has evolved; if some ancient societies failed to record personality judgments, it would be evidence against such an evolutionary position. In addition, learning about the prevalence and specifics of ancient personality judgments can help psychologists better understand the prehistory of personality psychology. Eight cultural traditions were studied: two each from China (Confucianism, Taoism), Greece (Classical and Hellenistic philosophy), India (Buddhism, Hinduism), and the Middle East (Judaism, Zoroastrianism). We found evidence that personality judgments were an important aspect of all of these traditions. Not only did people judge one another, but they also offered instructions on how to judge others. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) |
format |
text |
author |
LIN, Stephanie C. LIN, Stephanie C. KOROGODSKY, Maria |
author_facet |
LIN, Stephanie C. LIN, Stephanie C. KOROGODSKY, Maria |
author_sort |
LIN, Stephanie C. |
title |
Exploring the universality of personality judgments: Evidence from the great transformation (1000 BCE–200 BCE) |
title_short |
Exploring the universality of personality judgments: Evidence from the great transformation (1000 BCE–200 BCE) |
title_full |
Exploring the universality of personality judgments: Evidence from the great transformation (1000 BCE–200 BCE) |
title_fullStr |
Exploring the universality of personality judgments: Evidence from the great transformation (1000 BCE–200 BCE) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Exploring the universality of personality judgments: Evidence from the great transformation (1000 BCE–200 BCE) |
title_sort |
exploring the universality of personality judgments: evidence from the great transformation (1000 bce–200 bce) |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5300 |
_version_ |
1770573725994844160 |