Projecting lower competence to maintain moral warmth in the avoidance of prosocial requests

When faced with prosocial requests, consumers face a difficult decision between taking on the request’s burden or appearing unwarm (unkind, uncaring). We propose that the desire to refuse such requests while protecting a morally warm image leads consumers to under-represent their competence. Althoug...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LIU, Peggy J., LIN, Stephanie C.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5403
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6402/viewcontent/Liu_et_al_2017_Journal_of_Consumer_Psychology__1_.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-6402
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-64022019-08-30T07:43:37Z Projecting lower competence to maintain moral warmth in the avoidance of prosocial requests LIU, Peggy J. LIN, Stephanie C. When faced with prosocial requests, consumers face a difficult decision between taking on the request’s burden or appearing unwarm (unkind, uncaring). We propose that the desire to refuse such requests while protecting a morally warm image leads consumers to under-represent their competence. Although consumers care strongly about being viewed as competent, five studies showed that they downplayed their competence to sidestep a prosocial request. This effect occurred across both self-reported and behavioral displays of competence. Further, the downplaying competence effect only occurred when facing an undesirable prosocial request, not a similarly undesirable proself request. The final studies showed that people specifically downplayed competence and not warmth. We further distinguished between social warmth (e.g., humor) and moral warmth (e.g., kindness), showing that when competence, social warmth, and moral warmth were all requisite skills for a prosocial task, people downplayed competence and social warmth more than moral warmth. These findings underscore that although people care strongly about being viewed as competent, they willingly trade off competence evaluations if evaluations of warmth—particularly moral warmth—are at risk. 2018-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5403 info:doi/10.1002/jcpy.1010 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6402/viewcontent/Liu_et_al_2017_Journal_of_Consumer_Psychology__1_.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Prosocial Self-evaluation Modesty Skill Competence Warmth Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods Marketing
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Prosocial
Self-evaluation
Modesty
Skill
Competence
Warmth
Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods
Marketing
spellingShingle Prosocial
Self-evaluation
Modesty
Skill
Competence
Warmth
Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods
Marketing
LIU, Peggy J.
LIN, Stephanie C.
Projecting lower competence to maintain moral warmth in the avoidance of prosocial requests
description When faced with prosocial requests, consumers face a difficult decision between taking on the request’s burden or appearing unwarm (unkind, uncaring). We propose that the desire to refuse such requests while protecting a morally warm image leads consumers to under-represent their competence. Although consumers care strongly about being viewed as competent, five studies showed that they downplayed their competence to sidestep a prosocial request. This effect occurred across both self-reported and behavioral displays of competence. Further, the downplaying competence effect only occurred when facing an undesirable prosocial request, not a similarly undesirable proself request. The final studies showed that people specifically downplayed competence and not warmth. We further distinguished between social warmth (e.g., humor) and moral warmth (e.g., kindness), showing that when competence, social warmth, and moral warmth were all requisite skills for a prosocial task, people downplayed competence and social warmth more than moral warmth. These findings underscore that although people care strongly about being viewed as competent, they willingly trade off competence evaluations if evaluations of warmth—particularly moral warmth—are at risk.
format text
author LIU, Peggy J.
LIN, Stephanie C.
author_facet LIU, Peggy J.
LIN, Stephanie C.
author_sort LIU, Peggy J.
title Projecting lower competence to maintain moral warmth in the avoidance of prosocial requests
title_short Projecting lower competence to maintain moral warmth in the avoidance of prosocial requests
title_full Projecting lower competence to maintain moral warmth in the avoidance of prosocial requests
title_fullStr Projecting lower competence to maintain moral warmth in the avoidance of prosocial requests
title_full_unstemmed Projecting lower competence to maintain moral warmth in the avoidance of prosocial requests
title_sort projecting lower competence to maintain moral warmth in the avoidance of prosocial requests
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2018
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5403
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/6402/viewcontent/Liu_et_al_2017_Journal_of_Consumer_Psychology__1_.pdf
_version_ 1770573892870471680