Taking leaps of faith: Evaluation criteria and resource commitments for early-stage inventions

Successfully developed academic inventions have the potential to spawn new technological domains, form the basis of thriving business ventures, and improve the well-being of society. However, evaluating whether an early-stage scientific invention truly has such potential is extremely difficult, and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: KIM, Phillip H., Reddi KOTHA, FOURNÉ, Sebastian P. L., COUSSEMENT, Kristof
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6086
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7085/viewcontent/Taking_leaps_of_faith__Evaluation_criteria_and_resource_commitmen.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-7085
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-70852020-04-01T02:58:44Z Taking leaps of faith: Evaluation criteria and resource commitments for early-stage inventions KIM, Phillip H. Reddi KOTHA, FOURNÉ, Sebastian P. L. COUSSEMENT, Kristof Successfully developed academic inventions have the potential to spawn new technological domains, form the basis of thriving business ventures, and improve the well-being of society. However, evaluating whether an early-stage scientific invention truly has such potential is extremely difficult, and financially backing such inventions is highly risky. And yet, organizations and their evaluators still back some of these inventions with resources for further development. We investigate this puzzle to pinpoint how and why evaluators decide to offer resource commitments at early stages, despite the red flags raised using standard evaluation criteria. Many academic inventions need these initial resources to dispel concerns regarding their commercial feasibility, so evaluators need to take a leap of faith with their support to prematurely avoid eliminating high-potential opportunities. We tested our theory using text analysis on nearly 700 invention evaluation reports written by a university’s technology transfer experts. Our results revealed that evaluators backed inventions based on their feasibility (overcoming doubt and assessing maturity) and desirability (background familiarity and scientific complexity). Using the context of the research laboratory, our study insights can be applied to many management situations in which early-stage opportunities are assessed for resource commitments under high uncertainty. 2019-02-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6086 info:doi/10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.004 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7085/viewcontent/Taking_leaps_of_faith__Evaluation_criteria_and_resource_commitmen.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University early-stage scientific inventions opportunity evaluation criteria high-risk opportunities text analysis resource commitments entrepreneurial action Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations Strategic Management Policy
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic early-stage scientific inventions
opportunity evaluation criteria
high-risk opportunities
text analysis
resource commitments
entrepreneurial action
Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations
Strategic Management Policy
spellingShingle early-stage scientific inventions
opportunity evaluation criteria
high-risk opportunities
text analysis
resource commitments
entrepreneurial action
Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations
Strategic Management Policy
KIM, Phillip H.
Reddi KOTHA,
FOURNÉ, Sebastian P. L.
COUSSEMENT, Kristof
Taking leaps of faith: Evaluation criteria and resource commitments for early-stage inventions
description Successfully developed academic inventions have the potential to spawn new technological domains, form the basis of thriving business ventures, and improve the well-being of society. However, evaluating whether an early-stage scientific invention truly has such potential is extremely difficult, and financially backing such inventions is highly risky. And yet, organizations and their evaluators still back some of these inventions with resources for further development. We investigate this puzzle to pinpoint how and why evaluators decide to offer resource commitments at early stages, despite the red flags raised using standard evaluation criteria. Many academic inventions need these initial resources to dispel concerns regarding their commercial feasibility, so evaluators need to take a leap of faith with their support to prematurely avoid eliminating high-potential opportunities. We tested our theory using text analysis on nearly 700 invention evaluation reports written by a university’s technology transfer experts. Our results revealed that evaluators backed inventions based on their feasibility (overcoming doubt and assessing maturity) and desirability (background familiarity and scientific complexity). Using the context of the research laboratory, our study insights can be applied to many management situations in which early-stage opportunities are assessed for resource commitments under high uncertainty.
format text
author KIM, Phillip H.
Reddi KOTHA,
FOURNÉ, Sebastian P. L.
COUSSEMENT, Kristof
author_facet KIM, Phillip H.
Reddi KOTHA,
FOURNÉ, Sebastian P. L.
COUSSEMENT, Kristof
author_sort KIM, Phillip H.
title Taking leaps of faith: Evaluation criteria and resource commitments for early-stage inventions
title_short Taking leaps of faith: Evaluation criteria and resource commitments for early-stage inventions
title_full Taking leaps of faith: Evaluation criteria and resource commitments for early-stage inventions
title_fullStr Taking leaps of faith: Evaluation criteria and resource commitments for early-stage inventions
title_full_unstemmed Taking leaps of faith: Evaluation criteria and resource commitments for early-stage inventions
title_sort taking leaps of faith: evaluation criteria and resource commitments for early-stage inventions
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2019
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6086
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7085/viewcontent/Taking_leaps_of_faith__Evaluation_criteria_and_resource_commitmen.pdf
_version_ 1770574584322457600