Introduction: Can we bridge the rigour-relevance gap?

The following series of articles emanate from a session held at the first Journal of Management Studies Conference on the theme of ‘Beyond knowledge management: advancing the organizational knowledge research agenda’. The conference was concerned to advance academic understanding of this broad topic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: FINCHAM, Robin, CLARK, Timothy Adrian Robert
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6267
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7266/viewcontent/Fincham_et_al_2009_Journal_of_Management_Studies.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-7266
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-72662019-09-20T03:55:31Z Introduction: Can we bridge the rigour-relevance gap? FINCHAM, Robin CLARK, Timothy Adrian Robert The following series of articles emanate from a session held at the first Journal of Management Studies Conference on the theme of ‘Beyond knowledge management: advancing the organizational knowledge research agenda’. The conference was concerned to advance academic understanding of this broad topic and in addition to reflect on the role of management scholars as creators, commodifiers and disseminators of management and organizational knowledge. The latter theme arose from debates in relation to the apparent marginality of business school academics in the production of management knowledge (Barley et al., 1988; Gibson and Tesone, 2001; Spell, 2001) and their consequent (in)ability to develop and conduct research with practitioners and then communicate the results of this research to a practising audience. Drawing on Shapiro et al. (2007, p. 249), this broad debate can be framed as either a ‘knowledge transfer problem’ (what they term ‘lost in translation’) or a ‘knowledge production problem’ (what they ‘lost before translation’). In the former the solution is to produce publications and outlets that are designed to be attractive to and easily accessed by practitioners. In the latter, the solution involves collaboration between academics and practitioners at different key stages of the research process (Pettigrew, 1997). In the papers that follow the nature of the management research–practice gap is debated as well as the helpfulness and viability of various solutions aimed at narrowing it. 2009-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6267 info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00834.x https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7266/viewcontent/Fincham_et_al_2009_Journal_of_Management_Studies.pdf Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Management Information Systems Organizational Behavior and Theory
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Management Information Systems
Organizational Behavior and Theory
spellingShingle Management Information Systems
Organizational Behavior and Theory
FINCHAM, Robin
CLARK, Timothy Adrian Robert
Introduction: Can we bridge the rigour-relevance gap?
description The following series of articles emanate from a session held at the first Journal of Management Studies Conference on the theme of ‘Beyond knowledge management: advancing the organizational knowledge research agenda’. The conference was concerned to advance academic understanding of this broad topic and in addition to reflect on the role of management scholars as creators, commodifiers and disseminators of management and organizational knowledge. The latter theme arose from debates in relation to the apparent marginality of business school academics in the production of management knowledge (Barley et al., 1988; Gibson and Tesone, 2001; Spell, 2001) and their consequent (in)ability to develop and conduct research with practitioners and then communicate the results of this research to a practising audience. Drawing on Shapiro et al. (2007, p. 249), this broad debate can be framed as either a ‘knowledge transfer problem’ (what they term ‘lost in translation’) or a ‘knowledge production problem’ (what they ‘lost before translation’). In the former the solution is to produce publications and outlets that are designed to be attractive to and easily accessed by practitioners. In the latter, the solution involves collaboration between academics and practitioners at different key stages of the research process (Pettigrew, 1997). In the papers that follow the nature of the management research–practice gap is debated as well as the helpfulness and viability of various solutions aimed at narrowing it.
format text
author FINCHAM, Robin
CLARK, Timothy Adrian Robert
author_facet FINCHAM, Robin
CLARK, Timothy Adrian Robert
author_sort FINCHAM, Robin
title Introduction: Can we bridge the rigour-relevance gap?
title_short Introduction: Can we bridge the rigour-relevance gap?
title_full Introduction: Can we bridge the rigour-relevance gap?
title_fullStr Introduction: Can we bridge the rigour-relevance gap?
title_full_unstemmed Introduction: Can we bridge the rigour-relevance gap?
title_sort introduction: can we bridge the rigour-relevance gap?
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2009
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6267
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7266/viewcontent/Fincham_et_al_2009_Journal_of_Management_Studies.pdf
_version_ 1770574720712835072