From dramaturgy to theatre as technology: The case of corporate theatre
This article examines a piece of corporate theatre. Although theatre has entered organization studies through the dramatistic writing of Kenneth Burke and the dramaturgical writings of Erving Goffman, this article is concerned with an approach variously described as organizational, radical, situatio...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2004
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6283 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7282/viewcontent/Dramaturgy_Theatre_Tech_2004_av.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-7282 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-72822019-09-20T04:01:46Z From dramaturgy to theatre as technology: The case of corporate theatre CLARK, Timothy Adrian Robert MANGHAM, Iain This article examines a piece of corporate theatre. Although theatre has entered organization studies through the dramatistic writing of Kenneth Burke and the dramaturgical writings of Erving Goffman, this article is concerned with an approach variously described as organizational, radical, situation or corporate theatre that treats theatre not primarily as a resource, an ontology or a metaphor but as a technology. This approach involves the deployment by an organization of dramatists, actors, directors, set designers, lighting specialists, and musicians to put on performances in front of audiences. Using frameworks derived from studies of theatre a particular piece of corporate theatre is described and analysed. It is argued that this form of theatre appears to be used to contain reflection and to promote the views of a particular group within an organization. It does not confront an audience but subtly suggests alternative ways of evaluating, construing and understanding issues. This may be achieved by anaesthetizing audience reaction by encouraging imaginative participation in the performance so that cherished beliefs and values do not appear to be directly challenged. 2004-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6283 info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00420.x https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7282/viewcontent/Dramaturgy_Theatre_Tech_2004_av.pdf Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Organizational Behavior and Theory Theatre and Performance Studies |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Organizational Behavior and Theory Theatre and Performance Studies |
spellingShingle |
Organizational Behavior and Theory Theatre and Performance Studies CLARK, Timothy Adrian Robert MANGHAM, Iain From dramaturgy to theatre as technology: The case of corporate theatre |
description |
This article examines a piece of corporate theatre. Although theatre has entered organization studies through the dramatistic writing of Kenneth Burke and the dramaturgical writings of Erving Goffman, this article is concerned with an approach variously described as organizational, radical, situation or corporate theatre that treats theatre not primarily as a resource, an ontology or a metaphor but as a technology. This approach involves the deployment by an organization of dramatists, actors, directors, set designers, lighting specialists, and musicians to put on performances in front of audiences. Using frameworks derived from studies of theatre a particular piece of corporate theatre is described and analysed. It is argued that this form of theatre appears to be used to contain reflection and to promote the views of a particular group within an organization. It does not confront an audience but subtly suggests alternative ways of evaluating, construing and understanding issues. This may be achieved by anaesthetizing audience reaction by encouraging imaginative participation in the performance so that cherished beliefs and values do not appear to be directly challenged. |
format |
text |
author |
CLARK, Timothy Adrian Robert MANGHAM, Iain |
author_facet |
CLARK, Timothy Adrian Robert MANGHAM, Iain |
author_sort |
CLARK, Timothy Adrian Robert |
title |
From dramaturgy to theatre as technology: The case of corporate theatre |
title_short |
From dramaturgy to theatre as technology: The case of corporate theatre |
title_full |
From dramaturgy to theatre as technology: The case of corporate theatre |
title_fullStr |
From dramaturgy to theatre as technology: The case of corporate theatre |
title_full_unstemmed |
From dramaturgy to theatre as technology: The case of corporate theatre |
title_sort |
from dramaturgy to theatre as technology: the case of corporate theatre |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2004 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6283 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7282/viewcontent/Dramaturgy_Theatre_Tech_2004_av.pdf |
_version_ |
1770574726987513856 |