Killing the cat? A review of curiosity at work

This paper focuses on the emergent importance of curiosity at work for individuals and organizations by reviewing management research on curiosity at work. We start by leveraging prior reviews on early and contemporary foundations of the curiosity construct in the larger psychological literature, wi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LIEVENS, Filip, HARRISON, Spencer H., MUSSEL, Patrick, LITMAN, Jordan A.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6861
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7860/viewcontent/Curiosity.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-7860
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-78602022-02-18T08:34:59Z Killing the cat? A review of curiosity at work LIEVENS, Filip HARRISON, Spencer H. MUSSEL, Patrick LITMAN, Jordan A. This paper focuses on the emergent importance of curiosity at work for individuals and organizations by reviewing management research on curiosity at work. We start by leveraging prior reviews on early and contemporary foundations of the curiosity construct in the larger psychological literature, with a focus on definitional clarity, dimensionality, and differences with other constructs in its nomological network. Next, we review different streams of management research on curiosity at work (i.e., broad generative and nongenerative effects, curiosity as a catalyst for personal action, curiosity as a catalyst for interpersonal action, curiosity as a catalyst for leadership, curiosity as an organizational or professional norm, and curiosity as a catalyst for organizing). Interweaving these diverse literatures and research streams gives us the wherewithal to provide conceptual clarity in curiosity research and highlight how curiosity has not only generative effects at the individual level but acts also as a more dynamic, interpersonal, and organizational property. In addition, our review brings attention to the potential dark side of curiosity. We end by outlining how the more nuanced insights of the role of curiosity at work generated by our review provide an impetus for future research. 2022-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6861 info:doi/10.5465/annals.2020.0203 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7860/viewcontent/Curiosity.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Curiosity behavior workplace Organizational Behavior and Theory
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Curiosity
behavior
workplace
Organizational Behavior and Theory
spellingShingle Curiosity
behavior
workplace
Organizational Behavior and Theory
LIEVENS, Filip
HARRISON, Spencer H.
MUSSEL, Patrick
LITMAN, Jordan A.
Killing the cat? A review of curiosity at work
description This paper focuses on the emergent importance of curiosity at work for individuals and organizations by reviewing management research on curiosity at work. We start by leveraging prior reviews on early and contemporary foundations of the curiosity construct in the larger psychological literature, with a focus on definitional clarity, dimensionality, and differences with other constructs in its nomological network. Next, we review different streams of management research on curiosity at work (i.e., broad generative and nongenerative effects, curiosity as a catalyst for personal action, curiosity as a catalyst for interpersonal action, curiosity as a catalyst for leadership, curiosity as an organizational or professional norm, and curiosity as a catalyst for organizing). Interweaving these diverse literatures and research streams gives us the wherewithal to provide conceptual clarity in curiosity research and highlight how curiosity has not only generative effects at the individual level but acts also as a more dynamic, interpersonal, and organizational property. In addition, our review brings attention to the potential dark side of curiosity. We end by outlining how the more nuanced insights of the role of curiosity at work generated by our review provide an impetus for future research.
format text
author LIEVENS, Filip
HARRISON, Spencer H.
MUSSEL, Patrick
LITMAN, Jordan A.
author_facet LIEVENS, Filip
HARRISON, Spencer H.
MUSSEL, Patrick
LITMAN, Jordan A.
author_sort LIEVENS, Filip
title Killing the cat? A review of curiosity at work
title_short Killing the cat? A review of curiosity at work
title_full Killing the cat? A review of curiosity at work
title_fullStr Killing the cat? A review of curiosity at work
title_full_unstemmed Killing the cat? A review of curiosity at work
title_sort killing the cat? a review of curiosity at work
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2022
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6861
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7860/viewcontent/Curiosity.pdf
_version_ 1770575950054948864