Killing the cat? A review of curiosity at work
This paper focuses on the emergent importance of curiosity at work for individuals and organizations by reviewing management research on curiosity at work. We start by leveraging prior reviews on early and contemporary foundations of the curiosity construct in the larger psychological literature, wi...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6861 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7860/viewcontent/Curiosity.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-7860 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-78602022-02-18T08:34:59Z Killing the cat? A review of curiosity at work LIEVENS, Filip HARRISON, Spencer H. MUSSEL, Patrick LITMAN, Jordan A. This paper focuses on the emergent importance of curiosity at work for individuals and organizations by reviewing management research on curiosity at work. We start by leveraging prior reviews on early and contemporary foundations of the curiosity construct in the larger psychological literature, with a focus on definitional clarity, dimensionality, and differences with other constructs in its nomological network. Next, we review different streams of management research on curiosity at work (i.e., broad generative and nongenerative effects, curiosity as a catalyst for personal action, curiosity as a catalyst for interpersonal action, curiosity as a catalyst for leadership, curiosity as an organizational or professional norm, and curiosity as a catalyst for organizing). Interweaving these diverse literatures and research streams gives us the wherewithal to provide conceptual clarity in curiosity research and highlight how curiosity has not only generative effects at the individual level but acts also as a more dynamic, interpersonal, and organizational property. In addition, our review brings attention to the potential dark side of curiosity. We end by outlining how the more nuanced insights of the role of curiosity at work generated by our review provide an impetus for future research. 2022-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6861 info:doi/10.5465/annals.2020.0203 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7860/viewcontent/Curiosity.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Curiosity behavior workplace Organizational Behavior and Theory |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Curiosity behavior workplace Organizational Behavior and Theory |
spellingShingle |
Curiosity behavior workplace Organizational Behavior and Theory LIEVENS, Filip HARRISON, Spencer H. MUSSEL, Patrick LITMAN, Jordan A. Killing the cat? A review of curiosity at work |
description |
This paper focuses on the emergent importance of curiosity at work for individuals and organizations by reviewing management research on curiosity at work. We start by leveraging prior reviews on early and contemporary foundations of the curiosity construct in the larger psychological literature, with a focus on definitional clarity, dimensionality, and differences with other constructs in its nomological network. Next, we review different streams of management research on curiosity at work (i.e., broad generative and nongenerative effects, curiosity as a catalyst for personal action, curiosity as a catalyst for interpersonal action, curiosity as a catalyst for leadership, curiosity as an organizational or professional norm, and curiosity as a catalyst for organizing). Interweaving these diverse literatures and research streams gives us the wherewithal to provide conceptual clarity in curiosity research and highlight how curiosity has not only generative effects at the individual level but acts also as a more dynamic, interpersonal, and organizational property. In addition, our review brings attention to the potential dark side of curiosity. We end by outlining how the more nuanced insights of the role of curiosity at work generated by our review provide an impetus for future research. |
format |
text |
author |
LIEVENS, Filip HARRISON, Spencer H. MUSSEL, Patrick LITMAN, Jordan A. |
author_facet |
LIEVENS, Filip HARRISON, Spencer H. MUSSEL, Patrick LITMAN, Jordan A. |
author_sort |
LIEVENS, Filip |
title |
Killing the cat? A review of curiosity at work |
title_short |
Killing the cat? A review of curiosity at work |
title_full |
Killing the cat? A review of curiosity at work |
title_fullStr |
Killing the cat? A review of curiosity at work |
title_full_unstemmed |
Killing the cat? A review of curiosity at work |
title_sort |
killing the cat? a review of curiosity at work |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6861 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7860/viewcontent/Curiosity.pdf |
_version_ |
1770575950054948864 |