Mindfulness and the risk-resilience tradeoff in organizations

Through this chapter, we seek to contribute to ongoing discussion about risk, resilience, and how they can be jointly managed (see Linkov, Trump, & Keisler, 2018), particularly in the context of organizations. We start by reviewing the traditional image of organizations. In this traditional imag...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: KUDESIA, Ravi S., REB, Jochen
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6891
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7890/viewcontent/Kudesia_et_al_for_IRGC_Resilience_Guide_Vol_2_2018.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-7890
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-78902022-01-27T07:45:07Z Mindfulness and the risk-resilience tradeoff in organizations KUDESIA, Ravi S. REB, Jochen Through this chapter, we seek to contribute to ongoing discussion about risk, resilience, and how they can be jointly managed (see Linkov, Trump, & Keisler, 2018), particularly in the context of organizations. We start by reviewing the traditional image of organizations. In this traditional image, processes related to risk and resilience are seen as complementary, as these processes pertain to distinct aspects of the organizational environment. We then complicate this theoretical image by introducing five underappreciated ways that risk and resilience processes may not be complementary in practice—because the aspects of the environment to which these processes pertain cannot always be easily distinguished and because enacting either of these processes can produce tradeoffs that constrain the other. We conclude by suggesting three principles rooted in mindfulness to help organizations manage these risk-resilience tradeoffs. In so doing, we hope to offer an updated image of organizations. This updated image may enrich discussions about risk and resilience within communities of theorists and practitioners alike—as well as across them. 2018-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6891 info:doi/10.5075/epfl-irgc-262527 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7890/viewcontent/Kudesia_et_al_for_IRGC_Resilience_Guide_Vol_2_2018.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Risk resilience mindfulness organization theory Organizational Behavior and Theory
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Risk
resilience
mindfulness
organization
theory
Organizational Behavior and Theory
spellingShingle Risk
resilience
mindfulness
organization
theory
Organizational Behavior and Theory
KUDESIA, Ravi S.
REB, Jochen
Mindfulness and the risk-resilience tradeoff in organizations
description Through this chapter, we seek to contribute to ongoing discussion about risk, resilience, and how they can be jointly managed (see Linkov, Trump, & Keisler, 2018), particularly in the context of organizations. We start by reviewing the traditional image of organizations. In this traditional image, processes related to risk and resilience are seen as complementary, as these processes pertain to distinct aspects of the organizational environment. We then complicate this theoretical image by introducing five underappreciated ways that risk and resilience processes may not be complementary in practice—because the aspects of the environment to which these processes pertain cannot always be easily distinguished and because enacting either of these processes can produce tradeoffs that constrain the other. We conclude by suggesting three principles rooted in mindfulness to help organizations manage these risk-resilience tradeoffs. In so doing, we hope to offer an updated image of organizations. This updated image may enrich discussions about risk and resilience within communities of theorists and practitioners alike—as well as across them.
format text
author KUDESIA, Ravi S.
REB, Jochen
author_facet KUDESIA, Ravi S.
REB, Jochen
author_sort KUDESIA, Ravi S.
title Mindfulness and the risk-resilience tradeoff in organizations
title_short Mindfulness and the risk-resilience tradeoff in organizations
title_full Mindfulness and the risk-resilience tradeoff in organizations
title_fullStr Mindfulness and the risk-resilience tradeoff in organizations
title_full_unstemmed Mindfulness and the risk-resilience tradeoff in organizations
title_sort mindfulness and the risk-resilience tradeoff in organizations
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2018
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6891
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7890/viewcontent/Kudesia_et_al_for_IRGC_Resilience_Guide_Vol_2_2018.pdf
_version_ 1770576028535619584