Platform-dependent entrepreneurs: Participants in an expanding universe of platforms?

The article Platform-dependent entrepreneurs: Power asymmetries, risks, and strategies in the platform economy drew on the intermediary business model to review the damaging actions that platform firms may employ with entrepreneurs. This exchange argues that platform firms may treat entrepreneurs di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: TSCHANG, F. Ted
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6967
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7966/viewcontent/PlatformDepEntrepreneurs_pv.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-7966
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-79662024-02-19T06:20:09Z Platform-dependent entrepreneurs: Participants in an expanding universe of platforms? TSCHANG, F. Ted The article Platform-dependent entrepreneurs: Power asymmetries, risks, and strategies in the platform economy drew on the intermediary business model to review the damaging actions that platform firms may employ with entrepreneurs. This exchange argues that platform firms may treat entrepreneurs differently on other platform types-particularly ones where complex relationships may cause participants and platforms to become mutually dependent, or where the platform's position depends less on extracting revenue directly from participants. I suggest that particular business models might facilitate the use of alternative strategic actions that are more benign toward entrepreneurs. These situations can determine additional boundary conditions for this emerging entrepreneurship theory. I provide examples from three platform types where alternative platform behaviors can be observed: platforms based on a sharing economy model; platforms that cultivate product lines or a wider ecosystem of services; and platforms that build communities to support their business model. These situations can mitigate platform firms' tendencies to treat platform participants as pure revenue sources (and can promote different treatments of platform participants). Many business models involve complex multi-actor relationships that can be designed to create different ways of generating revenue. These design affordances can then support broader strategic actions. 2021-11-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6967 info:doi/10.5465/amp.2020.0140 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7966/viewcontent/PlatformDepEntrepreneurs_pv.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations Strategic Management Policy
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations
Strategic Management Policy
spellingShingle Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations
Strategic Management Policy
TSCHANG, F. Ted
Platform-dependent entrepreneurs: Participants in an expanding universe of platforms?
description The article Platform-dependent entrepreneurs: Power asymmetries, risks, and strategies in the platform economy drew on the intermediary business model to review the damaging actions that platform firms may employ with entrepreneurs. This exchange argues that platform firms may treat entrepreneurs differently on other platform types-particularly ones where complex relationships may cause participants and platforms to become mutually dependent, or where the platform's position depends less on extracting revenue directly from participants. I suggest that particular business models might facilitate the use of alternative strategic actions that are more benign toward entrepreneurs. These situations can determine additional boundary conditions for this emerging entrepreneurship theory. I provide examples from three platform types where alternative platform behaviors can be observed: platforms based on a sharing economy model; platforms that cultivate product lines or a wider ecosystem of services; and platforms that build communities to support their business model. These situations can mitigate platform firms' tendencies to treat platform participants as pure revenue sources (and can promote different treatments of platform participants). Many business models involve complex multi-actor relationships that can be designed to create different ways of generating revenue. These design affordances can then support broader strategic actions.
format text
author TSCHANG, F. Ted
author_facet TSCHANG, F. Ted
author_sort TSCHANG, F. Ted
title Platform-dependent entrepreneurs: Participants in an expanding universe of platforms?
title_short Platform-dependent entrepreneurs: Participants in an expanding universe of platforms?
title_full Platform-dependent entrepreneurs: Participants in an expanding universe of platforms?
title_fullStr Platform-dependent entrepreneurs: Participants in an expanding universe of platforms?
title_full_unstemmed Platform-dependent entrepreneurs: Participants in an expanding universe of platforms?
title_sort platform-dependent entrepreneurs: participants in an expanding universe of platforms?
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2021
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/6967
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/7966/viewcontent/PlatformDepEntrepreneurs_pv.pdf
_version_ 1794549692743286784