Innovation in dynamic knowledge landscapes: using topic modelling to map inventive activity and its implications for financial performance

We examine the relationship between innovation and performance in the agricultural industry by studying how a firm's patent portfolio position in the knowledge landscape moderates the relationship between three firm search dimensions (scope, specialisation, and commitment) and the firm's f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Simon J.D. SCHILLEBEECKX, LIN, Yimin, GEORGE, Gerard
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7009
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8008/viewcontent/InnovationDynamicKnowledgeLandscapes_pvoa_nc.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
Description
Summary:We examine the relationship between innovation and performance in the agricultural industry by studying how a firm's patent portfolio position in the knowledge landscape moderates the relationship between three firm search dimensions (scope, specialisation, and commitment) and the firm's financial performance. To represent dynamism in the knowledge landscape, we apply topic modelling to 67,120 patent texts of 571 firms and introduce two complementary perspectives on how knowledge can be dynamically categorised. This allows us to create two representations of the knowledge structure to identify contested (scarce) clusters of high (low) recent inventive activity and emergent clusters where knowledge ambiguity has reduced. Our findings suggest that search scope and commitment prove more valuable near scarce clusters, whereas search specialisation is most valuable in contested clusters. In addition, we find that all three search dimensions are positively moderated by proximity to emergent clusters, but vary in their effectiveness. Our results explain an additional 1% in within-firm financial performance (EBITDA). We discuss implications for innovation and strategy research as well as for practice.