A dynamic delegated investment model of SPACs

We study SPACs in a continuous-time delegated investment model. Our model is built upon three unique features of SPACs: the sponsor and the investor are only partially aligned, a SPAC has a short time horizon, and the investor has the final control over investment approval. Due to the misalignment i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LUO, Dan, SUN, Jian
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7037
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8036/viewcontent/SSRN_id3929762.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-8036
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-80362022-08-02T08:02:58Z A dynamic delegated investment model of SPACs LUO, Dan SUN, Jian We study SPACs in a continuous-time delegated investment model. Our model is built upon three unique features of SPACs: the sponsor and the investor are only partially aligned, a SPAC has a short time horizon, and the investor has the final control over investment approval. Due to the misalignment in incentives, the sponsor has an increasing incentive to propose unprofitable projects to the investor; in response, the investor exerts more stringent screening based on her information. Although the screening helps curb the sponsor’s moral hazard, it also dampens the disciplining effect of partial alignment in incentives. When the investor’s information is sufficiently noisy, the second effect dominates, so giving the investor the control over investment approval reduces everyone’s welfare. This adverse effect is more pronounced if entrepreneurs’ strategic choices of SPAC or the sponsor’s strategic choice of effort are considered. We find that introducing public assessment and making the investor’s control right contingent on it may benefit both parties. We also explore whether a SPAC should be allowed to continue after the current project is disapproved by the investor. 2021-09-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7037 info:doi/10.2139/ssrn.3929762 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8036/viewcontent/SSRN_id3929762.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University SPAC delegated investment dynamic delegation moral hazard Finance and Financial Management Portfolio and Security Analysis
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic SPAC
delegated investment
dynamic delegation
moral hazard
Finance and Financial Management
Portfolio and Security Analysis
spellingShingle SPAC
delegated investment
dynamic delegation
moral hazard
Finance and Financial Management
Portfolio and Security Analysis
LUO, Dan
SUN, Jian
A dynamic delegated investment model of SPACs
description We study SPACs in a continuous-time delegated investment model. Our model is built upon three unique features of SPACs: the sponsor and the investor are only partially aligned, a SPAC has a short time horizon, and the investor has the final control over investment approval. Due to the misalignment in incentives, the sponsor has an increasing incentive to propose unprofitable projects to the investor; in response, the investor exerts more stringent screening based on her information. Although the screening helps curb the sponsor’s moral hazard, it also dampens the disciplining effect of partial alignment in incentives. When the investor’s information is sufficiently noisy, the second effect dominates, so giving the investor the control over investment approval reduces everyone’s welfare. This adverse effect is more pronounced if entrepreneurs’ strategic choices of SPAC or the sponsor’s strategic choice of effort are considered. We find that introducing public assessment and making the investor’s control right contingent on it may benefit both parties. We also explore whether a SPAC should be allowed to continue after the current project is disapproved by the investor.
format text
author LUO, Dan
SUN, Jian
author_facet LUO, Dan
SUN, Jian
author_sort LUO, Dan
title A dynamic delegated investment model of SPACs
title_short A dynamic delegated investment model of SPACs
title_full A dynamic delegated investment model of SPACs
title_fullStr A dynamic delegated investment model of SPACs
title_full_unstemmed A dynamic delegated investment model of SPACs
title_sort dynamic delegated investment model of spacs
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2021
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7037
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8036/viewcontent/SSRN_id3929762.pdf
_version_ 1770576247978459136