Algorithmic transparency

I study the optimal algorithmic disclosure in a lending market where lenders use a predictive algorithm to mitigate adverse selection. The predictive algorithm is unobservable to borrowers and uses a manipulable borrower feature as input. A regulator maximizes market efficiency by disclosing informa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: SUN, Jian
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7109
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8108/viewcontent/JMP.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-8108
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research-81082022-12-12T04:11:45Z Algorithmic transparency SUN, Jian I study the optimal algorithmic disclosure in a lending market where lenders use a predictive algorithm to mitigate adverse selection. The predictive algorithm is unobservable to borrowers and uses a manipulable borrower feature as input. A regulator maximizes market efficiency by disclosing information about the statistical properties of variables embedded in the predictive algorithm to borrowers. Under the optimal disclosure policy, the posterior belief consists of two disjoint regions in which the borrower feature is more relevant and less relevant in predicting borrower quality, respectively. The optimal disclosure policy differentiates posterior lending market equilibria by the equilibrium data manipulation levels. Equilibria with more data manipulation hurt market efficiency, but also discourage lenders’ use of the borrower feature. Equilibria with less data manipulation benefit from that and generate more efficient market outcomes. Unconditionally, the borrower feature is used less intensively under optimal disclosure. This information design problem can be reduced to a one-dimensional maximization problem by imposing a mild distributional assumption on manipulation cost. As an extension, I also discuss the joint design of algorithmic disclosure and costly verification. 2021-11-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7109 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8108/viewcontent/JMP.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University adverse selection FinTech Bayesian persuasion algorithmic transparency Finance Finance and Financial Management
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic adverse selection
FinTech
Bayesian persuasion
algorithmic transparency
Finance
Finance and Financial Management
spellingShingle adverse selection
FinTech
Bayesian persuasion
algorithmic transparency
Finance
Finance and Financial Management
SUN, Jian
Algorithmic transparency
description I study the optimal algorithmic disclosure in a lending market where lenders use a predictive algorithm to mitigate adverse selection. The predictive algorithm is unobservable to borrowers and uses a manipulable borrower feature as input. A regulator maximizes market efficiency by disclosing information about the statistical properties of variables embedded in the predictive algorithm to borrowers. Under the optimal disclosure policy, the posterior belief consists of two disjoint regions in which the borrower feature is more relevant and less relevant in predicting borrower quality, respectively. The optimal disclosure policy differentiates posterior lending market equilibria by the equilibrium data manipulation levels. Equilibria with more data manipulation hurt market efficiency, but also discourage lenders’ use of the borrower feature. Equilibria with less data manipulation benefit from that and generate more efficient market outcomes. Unconditionally, the borrower feature is used less intensively under optimal disclosure. This information design problem can be reduced to a one-dimensional maximization problem by imposing a mild distributional assumption on manipulation cost. As an extension, I also discuss the joint design of algorithmic disclosure and costly verification.
format text
author SUN, Jian
author_facet SUN, Jian
author_sort SUN, Jian
title Algorithmic transparency
title_short Algorithmic transparency
title_full Algorithmic transparency
title_fullStr Algorithmic transparency
title_full_unstemmed Algorithmic transparency
title_sort algorithmic transparency
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2021
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/7109
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/lkcsb_research/article/8108/viewcontent/JMP.pdf
_version_ 1770576367606300672