Note to self: How I can be a better reviewer?

In this article I review some of the common errors I have made as a reviewer and suggest ways to avoid them.The progress of science depends on reviewers as much as it depends upon researchers developing new science. Reviewers provide impartial, anonymous, and expert advice to researchers, and they s...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	KOTHA, Reddi
Format:	text
Language:	English
Published:	Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2022
Subjects:	reviewer errors Community-Based Learning Educational Methods
Online Access:	https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research_all/15 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=lkcsb_research_all
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution:	Singapore Management University
Language:	English

id	sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research_all-1020
record_format	dspace
spelling	sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research_all-10202022-03-15T01:25:51Z Note to self: How I can be a better reviewer? KOTHA, Reddi In this article I review some of the common errors I have made as a reviewer and suggest ways to avoid them.The progress of science depends on reviewers as much as it depends upon researchers developing new science. Reviewers provide impartial, anonymous, and expert advice to researchers, and they screen which research gets published in scientific journals. When the review process works well, it acts as an effective filter and enables dissemination of high-quality and rigorous scientific work. As so much of scientific progress depends upon review, it is surprising that reviewers learn this science by doing. Of course, there are articles that suggest general norms of behavior for reviewers. 2022-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research_all/15 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=lkcsb_research_all http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School of Business eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University reviewer errors Community-Based Learning Educational Methods
institution	Singapore Management University
building	SMU Libraries
continent	Asia
country	Singapore Singapore
content_provider	SMU Libraries
collection	InK@SMU
language	English
topic	reviewer errors Community-Based Learning Educational Methods
spellingShingle	reviewer errors Community-Based Learning Educational Methods KOTHA, Reddi Note to self: How I can be a better reviewer?
description	In this article I review some of the common errors I have made as a reviewer and suggest ways to avoid them.The progress of science depends on reviewers as much as it depends upon researchers developing new science. Reviewers provide impartial, anonymous, and expert advice to researchers, and they screen which research gets published in scientific journals. When the review process works well, it acts as an effective filter and enables dissemination of high-quality and rigorous scientific work. As so much of scientific progress depends upon review, it is surprising that reviewers learn this science by doing. Of course, there are articles that suggest general norms of behavior for reviewers.
format	text
author	KOTHA, Reddi
author_facet	KOTHA, Reddi
author_sort	KOTHA, Reddi
title	Note to self: How I can be a better reviewer?
title_short	Note to self: How I can be a better reviewer?
title_full	Note to self: How I can be a better reviewer?
title_fullStr	Note to self: How I can be a better reviewer?
title_full_unstemmed	Note to self: How I can be a better reviewer?
title_sort	note to self: how i can be a better reviewer?
publisher	Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate	2022
url	https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research_all/15 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1020&context=lkcsb_research_all
_version_	1745575047498563584

Note to self: How I can be a better reviewer?

Similar Items