Out-of-Sample Equity Premium Prediction: Economic Fundamentals Vs. Moving-Average Rules
This paper analyzes the ability of both economic variables and moving-average rules to forecast the monthly U.S. equity premium using out-of-sample tests for 1960-2008. Both approaches provide statistically and economically significant out-of-sample forecasting gains, which are concentrated in U.S....
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research_smu/18 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=lkcsb_research_smu |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research_smu-1017 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research_smu-10172018-07-10T06:08:15Z Out-of-Sample Equity Premium Prediction: Economic Fundamentals Vs. Moving-Average Rules Neely, Christopher Rapach, David TU, Jun Zhou, Guofu This paper analyzes the ability of both economic variables and moving-average rules to forecast the monthly U.S. equity premium using out-of-sample tests for 1960-2008. Both approaches provide statistically and economically significant out-of-sample forecasting gains, which are concentrated in U.S. business-cycle recessions. Nevertheless, economic variables and moving-average rules capture different sources of equity premium fluctuations: moving average rules detect the decline in the average equity premium early in recessions, while economic variables more readily pick up the rise in the average equity premium later in recessions. When we simulate data with a habit-formation model characterized by time-varying return volatility and risk aversion relating to business-cycle fluctuations, we find that this model cannot fully account for the out-of-sample forecasting gains in the actual data evidenced by economic variables and moving-average rules. 2010-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research_smu/18 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=lkcsb_research_smu http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business (SMU Access Only) eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Equity premium predictability Economic variables Moving-average rules Out of sample forecasts Asset allocation Mean-variance investor Business cycle Habit formation Finance and Financial Management Portfolio and Security Analysis |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
country |
Singapore |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Equity premium predictability Economic variables Moving-average rules Out of sample forecasts Asset allocation Mean-variance investor Business cycle Habit formation Finance and Financial Management Portfolio and Security Analysis |
spellingShingle |
Equity premium predictability Economic variables Moving-average rules Out of sample forecasts Asset allocation Mean-variance investor Business cycle Habit formation Finance and Financial Management Portfolio and Security Analysis Neely, Christopher Rapach, David TU, Jun Zhou, Guofu Out-of-Sample Equity Premium Prediction: Economic Fundamentals Vs. Moving-Average Rules |
description |
This paper analyzes the ability of both economic variables and moving-average rules to forecast the monthly U.S. equity premium using out-of-sample tests for 1960-2008. Both approaches provide statistically and economically significant out-of-sample forecasting gains, which are concentrated in U.S. business-cycle recessions. Nevertheless, economic variables and moving-average rules capture different sources of equity premium fluctuations: moving average rules detect the decline in the average equity premium early in recessions, while economic variables more readily pick up the rise in the average equity premium later in recessions. When we simulate data with a habit-formation model characterized by time-varying return volatility and risk aversion relating to business-cycle fluctuations, we find that this model cannot fully account for the out-of-sample forecasting gains in the actual data evidenced by economic variables and moving-average rules. |
format |
text |
author |
Neely, Christopher Rapach, David TU, Jun Zhou, Guofu |
author_facet |
Neely, Christopher Rapach, David TU, Jun Zhou, Guofu |
author_sort |
Neely, Christopher |
title |
Out-of-Sample Equity Premium Prediction: Economic Fundamentals Vs. Moving-Average Rules |
title_short |
Out-of-Sample Equity Premium Prediction: Economic Fundamentals Vs. Moving-Average Rules |
title_full |
Out-of-Sample Equity Premium Prediction: Economic Fundamentals Vs. Moving-Average Rules |
title_fullStr |
Out-of-Sample Equity Premium Prediction: Economic Fundamentals Vs. Moving-Average Rules |
title_full_unstemmed |
Out-of-Sample Equity Premium Prediction: Economic Fundamentals Vs. Moving-Average Rules |
title_sort |
out-of-sample equity premium prediction: economic fundamentals vs. moving-average rules |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research_smu/18 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=lkcsb_research_smu |
_version_ |
1681132866537259008 |