Out-of-Sample Equity Premium Prediction: Economic Fundamentals Vs. Moving-Average Rules

This paper analyzes the ability of both economic variables and moving-average rules to forecast the monthly U.S. equity premium using out-of-sample tests for 1960-2008. Both approaches provide statistically and economically significant out-of-sample forecasting gains, which are concentrated in U.S....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Neely, Christopher, Rapach, David, TU, Jun, Zhou, Guofu
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research_smu/18
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=lkcsb_research_smu
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research_smu-1017
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.lkcsb_research_smu-10172018-07-10T06:08:15Z Out-of-Sample Equity Premium Prediction: Economic Fundamentals Vs. Moving-Average Rules Neely, Christopher Rapach, David TU, Jun Zhou, Guofu This paper analyzes the ability of both economic variables and moving-average rules to forecast the monthly U.S. equity premium using out-of-sample tests for 1960-2008. Both approaches provide statistically and economically significant out-of-sample forecasting gains, which are concentrated in U.S. business-cycle recessions. Nevertheless, economic variables and moving-average rules capture different sources of equity premium fluctuations: moving average rules detect the decline in the average equity premium early in recessions, while economic variables more readily pick up the rise in the average equity premium later in recessions. When we simulate data with a habit-formation model characterized by time-varying return volatility and risk aversion relating to business-cycle fluctuations, we find that this model cannot fully account for the out-of-sample forecasting gains in the actual data evidenced by economic variables and moving-average rules. 2010-03-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research_smu/18 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=lkcsb_research_smu http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School Of Business (SMU Access Only) eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Equity premium predictability Economic variables Moving-average rules Out of sample forecasts Asset allocation Mean-variance investor Business cycle Habit formation Finance and Financial Management Portfolio and Security Analysis
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
country Singapore
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Equity premium predictability
Economic variables
Moving-average rules
Out of sample forecasts
Asset allocation
Mean-variance investor
Business cycle
Habit formation
Finance and Financial Management
Portfolio and Security Analysis
spellingShingle Equity premium predictability
Economic variables
Moving-average rules
Out of sample forecasts
Asset allocation
Mean-variance investor
Business cycle
Habit formation
Finance and Financial Management
Portfolio and Security Analysis
Neely, Christopher
Rapach, David
TU, Jun
Zhou, Guofu
Out-of-Sample Equity Premium Prediction: Economic Fundamentals Vs. Moving-Average Rules
description This paper analyzes the ability of both economic variables and moving-average rules to forecast the monthly U.S. equity premium using out-of-sample tests for 1960-2008. Both approaches provide statistically and economically significant out-of-sample forecasting gains, which are concentrated in U.S. business-cycle recessions. Nevertheless, economic variables and moving-average rules capture different sources of equity premium fluctuations: moving average rules detect the decline in the average equity premium early in recessions, while economic variables more readily pick up the rise in the average equity premium later in recessions. When we simulate data with a habit-formation model characterized by time-varying return volatility and risk aversion relating to business-cycle fluctuations, we find that this model cannot fully account for the out-of-sample forecasting gains in the actual data evidenced by economic variables and moving-average rules.
format text
author Neely, Christopher
Rapach, David
TU, Jun
Zhou, Guofu
author_facet Neely, Christopher
Rapach, David
TU, Jun
Zhou, Guofu
author_sort Neely, Christopher
title Out-of-Sample Equity Premium Prediction: Economic Fundamentals Vs. Moving-Average Rules
title_short Out-of-Sample Equity Premium Prediction: Economic Fundamentals Vs. Moving-Average Rules
title_full Out-of-Sample Equity Premium Prediction: Economic Fundamentals Vs. Moving-Average Rules
title_fullStr Out-of-Sample Equity Premium Prediction: Economic Fundamentals Vs. Moving-Average Rules
title_full_unstemmed Out-of-Sample Equity Premium Prediction: Economic Fundamentals Vs. Moving-Average Rules
title_sort out-of-sample equity premium prediction: economic fundamentals vs. moving-average rules
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2010
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research_smu/18
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1017&context=lkcsb_research_smu
_version_ 1681132866537259008