Questionable Research Practices and Open Science: A Scientometric Perspective of 50 years of Research
Questionable research practises (QRPs) have been the focus of the scientific community amid greater scrutiny and evidence highlighting issues with replicability across many fields of science. To capture the most impactful publications and the main thematic domains in the literature on QRPs, this stu...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | text |
| Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2024
|
| Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sgor2024/programme/schedule/12 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sgor2024/article/1012/viewcontent/09_MichelleNeoh_QRP.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Singapore Management University |
| Summary: | Questionable research practises (QRPs) have been the focus of the scientific community amid greater scrutiny and evidence highlighting issues with replicability across many fields of science. To capture the most impactful publications and the main thematic domains in the literature on QRPs, this study uses a document co-citation analysis. The analysis was conducted on a sample of 341 documents that covered the past 50 years of research in QRPs. Nine major thematic clusters emerged. Statistical reporting and statistical power emerged as key areas of research, where systemic-level factors in how research is conducted are consistently raised as the precipitating factors for QRPs. There is also an encouraging shift in the focus of research into open science practises designed to address engagement in QRPs. Such a shift is indicative of the growing momentum of the open science movement, and more research can be conducted on how these practises are employed on the ground and how their uptake by researchers can be further promoted. |
|---|