Equivalence and similarity refutation for probabilistic programs
We consider the problems of statically refuting equivalence and similarity of output distributions defined by a pair of probabilistic programs. Equivalence and similarity are two fundamental relational properties of probabilistic programs that are essential for their correctness both in implementati...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2025
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/9063 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/10066/viewcontent/3656462.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-10066 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-100662024-08-01T15:31:59Z Equivalence and similarity refutation for probabilistic programs CHATTERJEE, Krishnendu GOHARSHADY, Ehsan Kafshdar NOVOTNÝ, Petr ZIKELIC, Dorde We consider the problems of statically refuting equivalence and similarity of output distributions defined by a pair of probabilistic programs. Equivalence and similarity are two fundamental relational properties of probabilistic programs that are essential for their correctness both in implementation and in compilation. In this work, we present a new method for static equivalence and similarity refutation. Our method refutes equivalence and similarity by computing a function over program outputs whose expected value with respect to the output distributions of two programs is different. The function is computed simultaneously with an upper expectation supermartingale and a lower expectation submartingale for the two programs, which we show to together provide a formal certificate for refuting equivalence and similarity. To the best of our knowledge, our method is the first approach to relational program analysis to offer the combination of the following desirable features: (1) it is fully automated, (2) it is applicable to infinite-state probabilistic programs, and (3) it provides formal guarantees on the correctness of its results. We implement a prototype of our method and our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method to refute equivalence and similarity for a number of examples collected from the literature. 2025-08-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/9063 info:doi/10.1145/3656462 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/10066/viewcontent/3656462.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Probabilistic programming Static program analysis Probability distribution equivalence Kantorovich distance Martingales Programming Languages and Compilers |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Probabilistic programming Static program analysis Probability distribution equivalence Kantorovich distance Martingales Programming Languages and Compilers |
spellingShingle |
Probabilistic programming Static program analysis Probability distribution equivalence Kantorovich distance Martingales Programming Languages and Compilers CHATTERJEE, Krishnendu GOHARSHADY, Ehsan Kafshdar NOVOTNÝ, Petr ZIKELIC, Dorde Equivalence and similarity refutation for probabilistic programs |
description |
We consider the problems of statically refuting equivalence and similarity of output distributions defined by a pair of probabilistic programs. Equivalence and similarity are two fundamental relational properties of probabilistic programs that are essential for their correctness both in implementation and in compilation. In this work, we present a new method for static equivalence and similarity refutation. Our method refutes equivalence and similarity by computing a function over program outputs whose expected value with respect to the output distributions of two programs is different. The function is computed simultaneously with an upper expectation supermartingale and a lower expectation submartingale for the two programs, which we show to together provide a formal certificate for refuting equivalence and similarity. To the best of our knowledge, our method is the first approach to relational program analysis to offer the combination of the following desirable features: (1) it is fully automated, (2) it is applicable to infinite-state probabilistic programs, and (3) it provides formal guarantees on the correctness of its results. We implement a prototype of our method and our experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our method to refute equivalence and similarity for a number of examples collected from the literature. |
format |
text |
author |
CHATTERJEE, Krishnendu GOHARSHADY, Ehsan Kafshdar NOVOTNÝ, Petr ZIKELIC, Dorde |
author_facet |
CHATTERJEE, Krishnendu GOHARSHADY, Ehsan Kafshdar NOVOTNÝ, Petr ZIKELIC, Dorde |
author_sort |
CHATTERJEE, Krishnendu |
title |
Equivalence and similarity refutation for probabilistic programs |
title_short |
Equivalence and similarity refutation for probabilistic programs |
title_full |
Equivalence and similarity refutation for probabilistic programs |
title_fullStr |
Equivalence and similarity refutation for probabilistic programs |
title_full_unstemmed |
Equivalence and similarity refutation for probabilistic programs |
title_sort |
equivalence and similarity refutation for probabilistic programs |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2025 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/9063 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/10066/viewcontent/3656462.pdf |
_version_ |
1814047721253765120 |