Question-attentive review-level explanation for neural rating regression
Recommendation explanations help to improve their acceptance by end users. Explanations come in many different forms. One that is of interest here is presenting an existing review of the recommended item as the explanation. The challenge is in selecting a suitable review, which is customarily addres...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/9851 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/10851/viewcontent/tist24.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-10851 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-108512024-12-24T03:21:34Z Question-attentive review-level explanation for neural rating regression LE, Trung Hoang LAUW, Hady Wirawan Recommendation explanations help to improve their acceptance by end users. Explanations come in many different forms. One that is of interest here is presenting an existing review of the recommended item as the explanation. The challenge is in selecting a suitable review, which is customarily addressed by assessing the relative importance or “attention” of each review to the recommendation objective. Our focus is improving review-level explanation by leveraging additional information in the form of questions and answers (QA). The proposed framework employs QA in an attention mechanism that aligns reviews to various QAs of an item and assesses their contribution jointly to the recommendation objective. The benefits are two-fold. For one, QA aids in selecting more useful reviews. For another, QA itself could accompany a well-aligned review in an expanded form of explanation. Experiments on datasets of 10 product categories showcase the efficacies of our method as compared to comparable baselines in identifying useful reviews and QAs, while maintaining parity in recommendation performance. 2024-12-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/9851 info:doi/10.1145/3699516 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/10851/viewcontent/tist24.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Recommendation explanations Review attention Recommendation reviews Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Numerical Analysis and Computation |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Recommendation explanations Review attention Recommendation reviews Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Numerical Analysis and Computation |
spellingShingle |
Recommendation explanations Review attention Recommendation reviews Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Numerical Analysis and Computation LE, Trung Hoang LAUW, Hady Wirawan Question-attentive review-level explanation for neural rating regression |
description |
Recommendation explanations help to improve their acceptance by end users. Explanations come in many different forms. One that is of interest here is presenting an existing review of the recommended item as the explanation. The challenge is in selecting a suitable review, which is customarily addressed by assessing the relative importance or “attention” of each review to the recommendation objective. Our focus is improving review-level explanation by leveraging additional information in the form of questions and answers (QA). The proposed framework employs QA in an attention mechanism that aligns reviews to various QAs of an item and assesses their contribution jointly to the recommendation objective. The benefits are two-fold. For one, QA aids in selecting more useful reviews. For another, QA itself could accompany a well-aligned review in an expanded form of explanation. Experiments on datasets of 10 product categories showcase the efficacies of our method as compared to comparable baselines in identifying useful reviews and QAs, while maintaining parity in recommendation performance. |
format |
text |
author |
LE, Trung Hoang LAUW, Hady Wirawan |
author_facet |
LE, Trung Hoang LAUW, Hady Wirawan |
author_sort |
LE, Trung Hoang |
title |
Question-attentive review-level explanation for neural rating regression |
title_short |
Question-attentive review-level explanation for neural rating regression |
title_full |
Question-attentive review-level explanation for neural rating regression |
title_fullStr |
Question-attentive review-level explanation for neural rating regression |
title_full_unstemmed |
Question-attentive review-level explanation for neural rating regression |
title_sort |
question-attentive review-level explanation for neural rating regression |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2024 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/9851 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/10851/viewcontent/tist24.pdf |
_version_ |
1820027799504683008 |