Question-attentive review-level explanation for neural rating regression

Recommendation explanations help to improve their acceptance by end users. Explanations come in many different forms. One that is of interest here is presenting an existing review of the recommended item as the explanation. The challenge is in selecting a suitable review, which is customarily addres...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LE, Trung Hoang, LAUW, Hady Wirawan
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/9851
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/10851/viewcontent/tist24.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sis_research-10851
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sis_research-108512024-12-24T03:21:34Z Question-attentive review-level explanation for neural rating regression LE, Trung Hoang LAUW, Hady Wirawan Recommendation explanations help to improve their acceptance by end users. Explanations come in many different forms. One that is of interest here is presenting an existing review of the recommended item as the explanation. The challenge is in selecting a suitable review, which is customarily addressed by assessing the relative importance or “attention” of each review to the recommendation objective. Our focus is improving review-level explanation by leveraging additional information in the form of questions and answers (QA). The proposed framework employs QA in an attention mechanism that aligns reviews to various QAs of an item and assesses their contribution jointly to the recommendation objective. The benefits are two-fold. For one, QA aids in selecting more useful reviews. For another, QA itself could accompany a well-aligned review in an expanded form of explanation. Experiments on datasets of 10 product categories showcase the efficacies of our method as compared to comparable baselines in identifying useful reviews and QAs, while maintaining parity in recommendation performance. 2024-12-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/9851 info:doi/10.1145/3699516 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/10851/viewcontent/tist24.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Recommendation explanations Review attention Recommendation reviews Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Numerical Analysis and Computation
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Recommendation explanations
Review attention
Recommendation reviews
Artificial Intelligence and Robotics
Numerical Analysis and Computation
spellingShingle Recommendation explanations
Review attention
Recommendation reviews
Artificial Intelligence and Robotics
Numerical Analysis and Computation
LE, Trung Hoang
LAUW, Hady Wirawan
Question-attentive review-level explanation for neural rating regression
description Recommendation explanations help to improve their acceptance by end users. Explanations come in many different forms. One that is of interest here is presenting an existing review of the recommended item as the explanation. The challenge is in selecting a suitable review, which is customarily addressed by assessing the relative importance or “attention” of each review to the recommendation objective. Our focus is improving review-level explanation by leveraging additional information in the form of questions and answers (QA). The proposed framework employs QA in an attention mechanism that aligns reviews to various QAs of an item and assesses their contribution jointly to the recommendation objective. The benefits are two-fold. For one, QA aids in selecting more useful reviews. For another, QA itself could accompany a well-aligned review in an expanded form of explanation. Experiments on datasets of 10 product categories showcase the efficacies of our method as compared to comparable baselines in identifying useful reviews and QAs, while maintaining parity in recommendation performance.
format text
author LE, Trung Hoang
LAUW, Hady Wirawan
author_facet LE, Trung Hoang
LAUW, Hady Wirawan
author_sort LE, Trung Hoang
title Question-attentive review-level explanation for neural rating regression
title_short Question-attentive review-level explanation for neural rating regression
title_full Question-attentive review-level explanation for neural rating regression
title_fullStr Question-attentive review-level explanation for neural rating regression
title_full_unstemmed Question-attentive review-level explanation for neural rating regression
title_sort question-attentive review-level explanation for neural rating regression
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2024
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/9851
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/10851/viewcontent/tist24.pdf
_version_ 1820027799504683008