An evidential reasoning approach to attribute value conflict resolution in database integration

Resolving domain incompatibility among independently developed databases often involves uncertain information. DeMichiel [1] showed that uncertain information can be generated by the mapping of conflicting attributes to a common domain, based on some domain knowledge. In this paper, we show that unc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LIM, Ee Peng, SRIVASTAVA, Jaideep, SHEKHAR, Shashi
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 1996
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/111
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/1110/viewcontent/00542025.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sis_research-1110
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sis_research-11102018-06-22T02:35:18Z An evidential reasoning approach to attribute value conflict resolution in database integration LIM, Ee Peng SRIVASTAVA, Jaideep SHEKHAR, Shashi Resolving domain incompatibility among independently developed databases often involves uncertain information. DeMichiel [1] showed that uncertain information can be generated by the mapping of conflicting attributes to a common domain, based on some domain knowledge. In this paper, we show that uncertain information can also arise when the database integration process requires information not directly represented in the component databases, but can be obtained through some summary of data. We therefore propose an extended relational model based on Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence [2] to incorporate such uncertain knowledge about the source databases. The extended relation uses evidence sets to represent uncertainty in information, which allow probabilities to be attached to subsets of possible domain values. We also develop a full set of extended relational operations over the extended relations. In particular, an extended union operation has been formalized to combine two extended relations using Dempster's rule of combination. The closure and boundedness properties of our proposed extended operations are formulated. We also illustrate the use of extended operations by some query examples. 1996-10-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/111 info:doi/10.1109/69.542025 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/1110/viewcontent/00542025.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Databases and Information Systems Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Databases and Information Systems
Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing
spellingShingle Databases and Information Systems
Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing
LIM, Ee Peng
SRIVASTAVA, Jaideep
SHEKHAR, Shashi
An evidential reasoning approach to attribute value conflict resolution in database integration
description Resolving domain incompatibility among independently developed databases often involves uncertain information. DeMichiel [1] showed that uncertain information can be generated by the mapping of conflicting attributes to a common domain, based on some domain knowledge. In this paper, we show that uncertain information can also arise when the database integration process requires information not directly represented in the component databases, but can be obtained through some summary of data. We therefore propose an extended relational model based on Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence [2] to incorporate such uncertain knowledge about the source databases. The extended relation uses evidence sets to represent uncertainty in information, which allow probabilities to be attached to subsets of possible domain values. We also develop a full set of extended relational operations over the extended relations. In particular, an extended union operation has been formalized to combine two extended relations using Dempster's rule of combination. The closure and boundedness properties of our proposed extended operations are formulated. We also illustrate the use of extended operations by some query examples.
format text
author LIM, Ee Peng
SRIVASTAVA, Jaideep
SHEKHAR, Shashi
author_facet LIM, Ee Peng
SRIVASTAVA, Jaideep
SHEKHAR, Shashi
author_sort LIM, Ee Peng
title An evidential reasoning approach to attribute value conflict resolution in database integration
title_short An evidential reasoning approach to attribute value conflict resolution in database integration
title_full An evidential reasoning approach to attribute value conflict resolution in database integration
title_fullStr An evidential reasoning approach to attribute value conflict resolution in database integration
title_full_unstemmed An evidential reasoning approach to attribute value conflict resolution in database integration
title_sort evidential reasoning approach to attribute value conflict resolution in database integration
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 1996
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/111
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/1110/viewcontent/00542025.pdf
_version_ 1770568875529732096