An evidential reasoning approach to attribute value conflict resolution in database integration
Resolving domain incompatibility among independently developed databases often involves uncertain information. DeMichiel [1] showed that uncertain information can be generated by the mapping of conflicting attributes to a common domain, based on some domain knowledge. In this paper, we show that unc...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
1996
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/111 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/1110/viewcontent/00542025.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-1110 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-11102018-06-22T02:35:18Z An evidential reasoning approach to attribute value conflict resolution in database integration LIM, Ee Peng SRIVASTAVA, Jaideep SHEKHAR, Shashi Resolving domain incompatibility among independently developed databases often involves uncertain information. DeMichiel [1] showed that uncertain information can be generated by the mapping of conflicting attributes to a common domain, based on some domain knowledge. In this paper, we show that uncertain information can also arise when the database integration process requires information not directly represented in the component databases, but can be obtained through some summary of data. We therefore propose an extended relational model based on Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence [2] to incorporate such uncertain knowledge about the source databases. The extended relation uses evidence sets to represent uncertainty in information, which allow probabilities to be attached to subsets of possible domain values. We also develop a full set of extended relational operations over the extended relations. In particular, an extended union operation has been formalized to combine two extended relations using Dempster's rule of combination. The closure and boundedness properties of our proposed extended operations are formulated. We also illustrate the use of extended operations by some query examples. 1996-10-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/111 info:doi/10.1109/69.542025 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/1110/viewcontent/00542025.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Databases and Information Systems Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Databases and Information Systems Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing |
spellingShingle |
Databases and Information Systems Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing LIM, Ee Peng SRIVASTAVA, Jaideep SHEKHAR, Shashi An evidential reasoning approach to attribute value conflict resolution in database integration |
description |
Resolving domain incompatibility among independently developed databases often involves uncertain information. DeMichiel [1] showed that uncertain information can be generated by the mapping of conflicting attributes to a common domain, based on some domain knowledge. In this paper, we show that uncertain information can also arise when the database integration process requires information not directly represented in the component databases, but can be obtained through some summary of data. We therefore propose an extended relational model based on Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence [2] to incorporate such uncertain knowledge about the source databases. The extended relation uses evidence sets to represent uncertainty in information, which allow probabilities to be attached to subsets of possible domain values. We also develop a full set of extended relational operations over the extended relations. In particular, an extended union operation has been formalized to combine two extended relations using Dempster's rule of combination. The closure and boundedness properties of our proposed extended operations are formulated. We also illustrate the use of extended operations by some query examples. |
format |
text |
author |
LIM, Ee Peng SRIVASTAVA, Jaideep SHEKHAR, Shashi |
author_facet |
LIM, Ee Peng SRIVASTAVA, Jaideep SHEKHAR, Shashi |
author_sort |
LIM, Ee Peng |
title |
An evidential reasoning approach to attribute value conflict resolution in database integration |
title_short |
An evidential reasoning approach to attribute value conflict resolution in database integration |
title_full |
An evidential reasoning approach to attribute value conflict resolution in database integration |
title_fullStr |
An evidential reasoning approach to attribute value conflict resolution in database integration |
title_full_unstemmed |
An evidential reasoning approach to attribute value conflict resolution in database integration |
title_sort |
evidential reasoning approach to attribute value conflict resolution in database integration |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
1996 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/111 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/1110/viewcontent/00542025.pdf |
_version_ |
1770568875529732096 |