Incorporating window-based passage-level evidence in document retrieval

This study investigated whether document retrieval can be improved if documents are divided into smaller sub-documents or passages and the retrieval score for these passages are incorporated in the final retrieval score for the whole document. The documents were segmented by sliding a window of a ce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: XI, Wensi, XU-RONG, Richard, KHOO, Christopher Soo Guan, LIM, Ee Peng
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2001
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/137
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/1136/viewcontent/93502143ba3c89e76ac250f709d94a2a72be.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
Description
Summary:This study investigated whether document retrieval can be improved if documents are divided into smaller sub-documents or passages and the retrieval score for these passages are incorporated in the final retrieval score for the whole document. The documents were segmented by sliding a window of a certain size across the document and extracting the words displayed each time the window stopped. A retrieval score was calculated for each of the passages extracted and the highest score obtained by a passage of that size was taken as the document’s passage-level score for that window size. A range of window sizes was tried. The experimental results indicated that using a fixed window size of 50 words gave better results than other window sizes for the TREC-5 and TREC-6 test collections. This window size yielded a significant retrieval improvement of 24% compared to using the whole-document retrieval score (using the traditional tf*idf weighting scheme with cosine normalisation). However, combining this window score and the whole-document retrieval score did not yield a retrieval improvement. Using a variable window size (ranging from 50 to 400 words) yielded a retrieval improvement of about 5% over using a fixed window size of 50. Different window sizes were found to work best for different queries. If the best window size to use for each query could be predicted accurately, a maximum retrieval improvement of 42% could be obtained. Subsequent work suggests that the usefulness of passage-level evidence in document retrieval depends on the weighting scheme and type of normalisation used in the retrieval method.