Quality-aware collaborative Question Answering: Methods and evaluation

Community Question Answering (QA) portals contain questions and answers contributed by hundreds of millions of users. These databases of questions and answers are of great value if they can be used directly to answer questions from any user. In this research, we address this collaborative QA task by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: SURYANTO, Maggy Anastasia, LIM, Ee Peng, SUN, Aixin, CHIANG, Roger Hsiang-Li
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/451
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/1450/viewcontent/10.1.1.215.3150.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sis_research-1450
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sis_research-14502018-06-25T04:35:32Z Quality-aware collaborative Question Answering: Methods and evaluation SURYANTO, Maggy Anastasia LIM, Ee Peng SUN, Aixin CHIANG, Roger Hsiang-Li Community Question Answering (QA) portals contain questions and answers contributed by hundreds of millions of users. These databases of questions and answers are of great value if they can be used directly to answer questions from any user. In this research, we address this collaborative QA task by drawing knowledge from the crowds in community QA portals such as Yahoo! Answers. Despite their popularity, it is well known that answers in community QA portals have unequal quality. We therefore propose a quality-aware framework to design methods that select answers from a community QA portal considering answer quality in addition to answer relevance. Besides using answer features for determining answer quality, we introduce several other quality-aware QA methods using answer quality derived from the expertise of answerers. Such expertise can be question independent or question dependent. We evaluate our proposed methods using a database of 95K questions and 537K answers obtained from Yahoo! Answers. Our experiments have shown that answer quality can improve QA performance significantly. Furthermore, question dependent expertise based methods are shown to outperform methods using answer features only. It is also found that there are also good answers not among the best answers identified by Yahoo! Answers users. 2009-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/451 info:doi/10.1145/1498759.1498820 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/1450/viewcontent/10.1.1.215.3150.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Answer quality Expertise Question answering Databases and Information Systems Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Answer quality
Expertise
Question answering
Databases and Information Systems
Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing
spellingShingle Answer quality
Expertise
Question answering
Databases and Information Systems
Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing
SURYANTO, Maggy Anastasia
LIM, Ee Peng
SUN, Aixin
CHIANG, Roger Hsiang-Li
Quality-aware collaborative Question Answering: Methods and evaluation
description Community Question Answering (QA) portals contain questions and answers contributed by hundreds of millions of users. These databases of questions and answers are of great value if they can be used directly to answer questions from any user. In this research, we address this collaborative QA task by drawing knowledge from the crowds in community QA portals such as Yahoo! Answers. Despite their popularity, it is well known that answers in community QA portals have unequal quality. We therefore propose a quality-aware framework to design methods that select answers from a community QA portal considering answer quality in addition to answer relevance. Besides using answer features for determining answer quality, we introduce several other quality-aware QA methods using answer quality derived from the expertise of answerers. Such expertise can be question independent or question dependent. We evaluate our proposed methods using a database of 95K questions and 537K answers obtained from Yahoo! Answers. Our experiments have shown that answer quality can improve QA performance significantly. Furthermore, question dependent expertise based methods are shown to outperform methods using answer features only. It is also found that there are also good answers not among the best answers identified by Yahoo! Answers users.
format text
author SURYANTO, Maggy Anastasia
LIM, Ee Peng
SUN, Aixin
CHIANG, Roger Hsiang-Li
author_facet SURYANTO, Maggy Anastasia
LIM, Ee Peng
SUN, Aixin
CHIANG, Roger Hsiang-Li
author_sort SURYANTO, Maggy Anastasia
title Quality-aware collaborative Question Answering: Methods and evaluation
title_short Quality-aware collaborative Question Answering: Methods and evaluation
title_full Quality-aware collaborative Question Answering: Methods and evaluation
title_fullStr Quality-aware collaborative Question Answering: Methods and evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Quality-aware collaborative Question Answering: Methods and evaluation
title_sort quality-aware collaborative question answering: methods and evaluation
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2009
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/451
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/1450/viewcontent/10.1.1.215.3150.pdf
_version_ 1770570429568647168