The Price of Stability in Selfish Scheduling Games

Game theory has gained popularity as an approach to analysing and understanding distributed systems with self-interested agents. Central to game theory is the concept of Nash equilibrium as a stable state (solution) of the system, which comes with a price − the loss in efficiency. The quantification...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: AGUSSURJA, Lucas, LAU, Hoong Chuin
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/793
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/1792/viewcontent/WIAS_2009___Scheduling_Game.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sis_research-1792
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sis_research-17922014-05-30T04:02:56Z The Price of Stability in Selfish Scheduling Games AGUSSURJA, Lucas LAU, Hoong Chuin Game theory has gained popularity as an approach to analysing and understanding distributed systems with self-interested agents. Central to game theory is the concept of Nash equilibrium as a stable state (solution) of the system, which comes with a price − the loss in efficiency. The quantification of the efficiency loss is one of the main research concerns. In this paper, we study the quality and computational characteristics of the best Nash equilibrium in two selfish scheduling models: the congestion model and the sequencing model. In particular, we present the following results: (1) In the congestion model: first, the best Nash equilibrium is socially optimum and consequently, computing the best Nash is NP-hard; second, any ε-approximation algorithm for finding the optimum can be transformed into an ε-approximation algorithm for the best Nash. (2) In sequencing model: for identical machines, we show that the best Nash is no better than the worst Nash and it is easy to compute; for related machines, we show that there is a gap between the worst and the best Nash equilibrium, and leave the analytical bound of this gap for future work. 2009-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/793 info:doi/10.3233/WIA-2009-0171 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/1792/viewcontent/WIAS_2009___Scheduling_Game.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Business Operations Research, Systems Engineering and Industrial Engineering
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Artificial Intelligence and Robotics
Business
Operations Research, Systems Engineering and Industrial Engineering
spellingShingle Artificial Intelligence and Robotics
Business
Operations Research, Systems Engineering and Industrial Engineering
AGUSSURJA, Lucas
LAU, Hoong Chuin
The Price of Stability in Selfish Scheduling Games
description Game theory has gained popularity as an approach to analysing and understanding distributed systems with self-interested agents. Central to game theory is the concept of Nash equilibrium as a stable state (solution) of the system, which comes with a price − the loss in efficiency. The quantification of the efficiency loss is one of the main research concerns. In this paper, we study the quality and computational characteristics of the best Nash equilibrium in two selfish scheduling models: the congestion model and the sequencing model. In particular, we present the following results: (1) In the congestion model: first, the best Nash equilibrium is socially optimum and consequently, computing the best Nash is NP-hard; second, any ε-approximation algorithm for finding the optimum can be transformed into an ε-approximation algorithm for the best Nash. (2) In sequencing model: for identical machines, we show that the best Nash is no better than the worst Nash and it is easy to compute; for related machines, we show that there is a gap between the worst and the best Nash equilibrium, and leave the analytical bound of this gap for future work.
format text
author AGUSSURJA, Lucas
LAU, Hoong Chuin
author_facet AGUSSURJA, Lucas
LAU, Hoong Chuin
author_sort AGUSSURJA, Lucas
title The Price of Stability in Selfish Scheduling Games
title_short The Price of Stability in Selfish Scheduling Games
title_full The Price of Stability in Selfish Scheduling Games
title_fullStr The Price of Stability in Selfish Scheduling Games
title_full_unstemmed The Price of Stability in Selfish Scheduling Games
title_sort price of stability in selfish scheduling games
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2009
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/793
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/1792/viewcontent/WIAS_2009___Scheduling_Game.pdf
_version_ 1770570718252105728