Auditing Interval-based Inference

In this paper we study the feasibility of auditing interval-based inference. Sensitive information about individuals is said to be compromised if an accurate enough interval, called inference interval, is obtained into which the value of the sensitive information must fall. Compared with auditing ex...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LI, Yingjiu, WANG, Lingyu, WANG, X. Sean, Jajodia, Sushil
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/1047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47961-9_38
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
Description
Summary:In this paper we study the feasibility of auditing interval-based inference. Sensitive information about individuals is said to be compromised if an accurate enough interval, called inference interval, is obtained into which the value of the sensitive information must fall. Compared with auditing exact inference that is traditionally studied, auditing interval-based inference is more complicated. Existing auditing methods such as audit expert do not apply to this case. Our result shows that it is intractable to audit interval-based inference for bounded integer values; while for bounded real values, the auditing problem is polynomial yet involves complicated computation of mathematical programming. To further examine the practicability of auditing interval-based inference, we classify various auditing methods into three categories: exact auditing, optimistic auditing, and pessimistic auditing. We analyze the trade-offs that can be achieved by these methods among various auditing objectives: inference security, database usability, and auditing complexity.