An empirical study of bugs in software build systems

• Main Authors: XIA, Xin, ZHOU, Xiaozhen, LO, David, ZHAO, Xiaoqiong
• Format: text
• Language: English
• Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2013
• Subjects: Bug Category; Empirical Study; Software Build System; Software Engineering
• Online Access: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/2023; https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/3022/viewcontent/An_Empirical_Study_of_Bugs_in_Software_Build_System.pdf
• Institution: Singapore Management University

Build system converts source code, libraries and other data into executable programs by orchestrating the execution of compilers and other tools. The whole building process is managed by a software build system, such as Make, Ant, CMake, Maven, Scons, and QMake. The reliability of software build systems would affect the reliability of the build process. In this paper, we perform an empirical study on bugs in software build systems. We analyze four software build systems, Ant, Maven, CMake and QMake, which are four typical and widely-used software build systems, and can be used to build Java, C, C++ systems. We investigate their bug database and code repositories, randomly sample a set of bug reports and their fixes (800 bugs reports totally, and 199, 250, 200, and 151 bug reports for Ant, Maven, CMake and QMake, respectively), and manually assign them into various categories. We find that 21.35% of the bugs belong to the external interface category, 18.23% of the bugs belong to the logic category, and 12.86% of the bugs belong to the configuration category. We also investigate the relationship between bug categories and bug severities.