A Comparison of Fundamental Network Formation Principles Between Offline and Online Friends on Twitter

We investigate the differences between how some of the fundamental principles of network formation apply among offline friends and how they apply among online friends on Twitter. We consider three fundamental principles of network formation proposed by Schaefer et al.: reciprocity, popularity, and t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: NATALI, Felicia, ZHU, Feida
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/3134
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/4134/viewcontent/ComparisonNetworkFormation_Twitter_2016_afv.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sis_research-4134
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sis_research-41342024-05-31T05:35:49Z A Comparison of Fundamental Network Formation Principles Between Offline and Online Friends on Twitter NATALI, Felicia ZHU, Feida We investigate the differences between how some of the fundamental principles of network formation apply among offline friends and how they apply among online friends on Twitter. We consider three fundamental principles of network formation proposed by Schaefer et al.: reciprocity, popularity, and triadic closure. Overall, we discover that these principles mainly apply to offline friends on Twitter. Based on how these principles apply to offline versus online friends, we formulate rules to predict offline friendship on Twitter. We compare our algorithm with popular machine learning algorithms and Xiewei’s random walk algorithm. Our algorithm beats the machine learning algorithms on average by 15 % in terms of f-score. Although our algorithm loses 6 % to Xiewei’s random walk algorithm in terms of f-score, it still performs well (f-score above 70 %), and it reduces prediction time complexity from O(n2)to O(n). 2016-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/3134 info:doi/10.1007/978-3-319-28361-6_14 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/4134/viewcontent/ComparisonNetworkFormation_Twitter_2016_afv.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Network formation Offline friends Online friends Twitter Social network Offline friends prediction Machine learning Offline online Databases and Information Systems Social Media
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Network formation
Offline friends
Online friends
Twitter Social network
Offline friends prediction
Machine learning
Offline online
Databases and Information Systems
Social Media
spellingShingle Network formation
Offline friends
Online friends
Twitter Social network
Offline friends prediction
Machine learning
Offline online
Databases and Information Systems
Social Media
NATALI, Felicia
ZHU, Feida
A Comparison of Fundamental Network Formation Principles Between Offline and Online Friends on Twitter
description We investigate the differences between how some of the fundamental principles of network formation apply among offline friends and how they apply among online friends on Twitter. We consider three fundamental principles of network formation proposed by Schaefer et al.: reciprocity, popularity, and triadic closure. Overall, we discover that these principles mainly apply to offline friends on Twitter. Based on how these principles apply to offline versus online friends, we formulate rules to predict offline friendship on Twitter. We compare our algorithm with popular machine learning algorithms and Xiewei’s random walk algorithm. Our algorithm beats the machine learning algorithms on average by 15 % in terms of f-score. Although our algorithm loses 6 % to Xiewei’s random walk algorithm in terms of f-score, it still performs well (f-score above 70 %), and it reduces prediction time complexity from O(n2)to O(n).
format text
author NATALI, Felicia
ZHU, Feida
author_facet NATALI, Felicia
ZHU, Feida
author_sort NATALI, Felicia
title A Comparison of Fundamental Network Formation Principles Between Offline and Online Friends on Twitter
title_short A Comparison of Fundamental Network Formation Principles Between Offline and Online Friends on Twitter
title_full A Comparison of Fundamental Network Formation Principles Between Offline and Online Friends on Twitter
title_fullStr A Comparison of Fundamental Network Formation Principles Between Offline and Online Friends on Twitter
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Fundamental Network Formation Principles Between Offline and Online Friends on Twitter
title_sort comparison of fundamental network formation principles between offline and online friends on twitter
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2016
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/3134
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/4134/viewcontent/ComparisonNetworkFormation_Twitter_2016_afv.pdf
_version_ 1814047554922348544