Collective rumor correction on the death hoax of a political figure in social media
Conversations on social media networks that discuss a crisis incident as it unfolds have become a norm in recent years. Left to its own devices, such conversations could quickly degenerate into rumor mills. Little research has thus far examined the correction of rumors on social media. Using the thi...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/3609 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/4610/viewcontent/CollectiveRumorCorrection_PACIS2016_pv.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-4610 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-46102024-01-23T02:27:44Z Collective rumor correction on the death hoax of a political figure in social media CHUA, Alton Y. K. CHEAH, Sin-Mei GOH, Dion Hoe-Lian Ee-peng LIM, Conversations on social media networks that discuss a crisis incident as it unfolds have become a norm in recent years. Left to its own devices, such conversations could quickly degenerate into rumor mills. Little research has thus far examined the correction of rumors on social media. Using the third person effect as a theoretical underpinning, we developed a model of collective rumor correction on social media based on an incident surrounding the death hoax of a political figure. Tweets from Twitter were collected and analyzed for the period when a spike of circulating rumors speculating the demise of Singapore's first prime minister was detected. Corrections of the rumor also went viral on the same day. Our study reveals that corrective behavior during a death hoax situation on Twitter is characterized by affirmative and rational rebuttals verifiable by credible sources. While the inclusion of credible sources is essential for both rumor diffusion and corrections, correcting a rumor differs from its diffusion in that unambiguity and low emotional levels are crucial. Key characteristics of collective rumor correction identified by this study have implications for both theory and practice. We discussed these implications together with the study's limitations and suggestions for future research. 2016-06-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/3609 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/4610/viewcontent/CollectiveRumorCorrection_PACIS2016_pv.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Death hoax Political figure Rumor correction Third-person effect Twitter Communication Technology and New Media Databases and Information Systems Social Media |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Death hoax Political figure Rumor correction Third-person effect Communication Technology and New Media Databases and Information Systems Social Media |
spellingShingle |
Death hoax Political figure Rumor correction Third-person effect Communication Technology and New Media Databases and Information Systems Social Media CHUA, Alton Y. K. CHEAH, Sin-Mei GOH, Dion Hoe-Lian Ee-peng LIM, Collective rumor correction on the death hoax of a political figure in social media |
description |
Conversations on social media networks that discuss a crisis incident as it unfolds have become a norm in recent years. Left to its own devices, such conversations could quickly degenerate into rumor mills. Little research has thus far examined the correction of rumors on social media. Using the third person effect as a theoretical underpinning, we developed a model of collective rumor correction on social media based on an incident surrounding the death hoax of a political figure. Tweets from Twitter were collected and analyzed for the period when a spike of circulating rumors speculating the demise of Singapore's first prime minister was detected. Corrections of the rumor also went viral on the same day. Our study reveals that corrective behavior during a death hoax situation on Twitter is characterized by affirmative and rational rebuttals verifiable by credible sources. While the inclusion of credible sources is essential for both rumor diffusion and corrections, correcting a rumor differs from its diffusion in that unambiguity and low emotional levels are crucial. Key characteristics of collective rumor correction identified by this study have implications for both theory and practice. We discussed these implications together with the study's limitations and suggestions for future research. |
format |
text |
author |
CHUA, Alton Y. K. CHEAH, Sin-Mei GOH, Dion Hoe-Lian Ee-peng LIM, |
author_facet |
CHUA, Alton Y. K. CHEAH, Sin-Mei GOH, Dion Hoe-Lian Ee-peng LIM, |
author_sort |
CHUA, Alton Y. K. |
title |
Collective rumor correction on the death hoax of a political figure in social media |
title_short |
Collective rumor correction on the death hoax of a political figure in social media |
title_full |
Collective rumor correction on the death hoax of a political figure in social media |
title_fullStr |
Collective rumor correction on the death hoax of a political figure in social media |
title_full_unstemmed |
Collective rumor correction on the death hoax of a political figure in social media |
title_sort |
collective rumor correction on the death hoax of a political figure in social media |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/3609 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/4610/viewcontent/CollectiveRumorCorrection_PACIS2016_pv.pdf |
_version_ |
1789483254476177408 |