Determining the impact regions of competing options in preference space

In rank-aware processing, user preferences are typically represented by a numeric weight per data attribute, collectively forming a weight vector. The score of an option (data record) is defined as the weighted sum of its individual attributes. The highest-scoring options across a set of alternative...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: TANG, Bo, MOURATIDIS, Kyriakos, YIU, Man Lung.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/3761
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/4763/viewcontent/SIGMOD17_kSPR__1_.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sis_research-4763
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sis_research-47632017-09-21T09:16:11Z Determining the impact regions of competing options in preference space TANG, Bo MOURATIDIS, Kyriakos YIU, Man Lung. In rank-aware processing, user preferences are typically represented by a numeric weight per data attribute, collectively forming a weight vector. The score of an option (data record) is defined as the weighted sum of its individual attributes. The highest-scoring options across a set of alternatives (dataset) are shortlisted for the user as the recommended ones. In that setting, the user input is a vector (equivalently, a point) in a d-dimensional preference space, where d is the number of data attributes. In this paper we study the problem of determining in which regions of the preference space the weight vector should lie so that a given option (focal record) is among the top-k score-wise. In effect, these regions capture all possible user profiles for which the focal record is highly preferable, and are therefore essential in market impact analysis, potential customer identification, profile-based marketing, targeted advertising, etc. We refer to our problem as k-Shortlist Preference Region identification (kSPR), and exploit its computational geometric nature to develop a framework for its efficient (and exact) processing. Using real and synthetic benchmarks, we show that our most optimized algorithm outperforms by three orders of magnitude a competitor we constructed from previous work on a different problem. 2017-05-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/3761 info:doi/10.1145/3035918.3064044 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/4763/viewcontent/SIGMOD17_kSPR__1_.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Databases and Information Systems
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Databases and Information Systems
spellingShingle Databases and Information Systems
TANG, Bo
MOURATIDIS, Kyriakos
YIU, Man Lung.
Determining the impact regions of competing options in preference space
description In rank-aware processing, user preferences are typically represented by a numeric weight per data attribute, collectively forming a weight vector. The score of an option (data record) is defined as the weighted sum of its individual attributes. The highest-scoring options across a set of alternatives (dataset) are shortlisted for the user as the recommended ones. In that setting, the user input is a vector (equivalently, a point) in a d-dimensional preference space, where d is the number of data attributes. In this paper we study the problem of determining in which regions of the preference space the weight vector should lie so that a given option (focal record) is among the top-k score-wise. In effect, these regions capture all possible user profiles for which the focal record is highly preferable, and are therefore essential in market impact analysis, potential customer identification, profile-based marketing, targeted advertising, etc. We refer to our problem as k-Shortlist Preference Region identification (kSPR), and exploit its computational geometric nature to develop a framework for its efficient (and exact) processing. Using real and synthetic benchmarks, we show that our most optimized algorithm outperforms by three orders of magnitude a competitor we constructed from previous work on a different problem.
format text
author TANG, Bo
MOURATIDIS, Kyriakos
YIU, Man Lung.
author_facet TANG, Bo
MOURATIDIS, Kyriakos
YIU, Man Lung.
author_sort TANG, Bo
title Determining the impact regions of competing options in preference space
title_short Determining the impact regions of competing options in preference space
title_full Determining the impact regions of competing options in preference space
title_fullStr Determining the impact regions of competing options in preference space
title_full_unstemmed Determining the impact regions of competing options in preference space
title_sort determining the impact regions of competing options in preference space
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2017
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/3761
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/4763/viewcontent/SIGMOD17_kSPR__1_.pdf
_version_ 1770573714458411008