From classification to quantification in tweet sentiment analysis
entiment classification has become a ubiquitous enabling technology in the Twittersphere, since classifying tweets according to the sentiment they convey towards a given entity (be it a product, a person, a political party, or a policy) has many applications in political science, social science, mar...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/4547 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/5550/viewcontent/classification_quantification_tweet.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-5550 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-55502019-12-26T09:05:17Z From classification to quantification in tweet sentiment analysis GAO, Wei SEBASTIANI, Fabrizio entiment classification has become a ubiquitous enabling technology in the Twittersphere, since classifying tweets according to the sentiment they convey towards a given entity (be it a product, a person, a political party, or a policy) has many applications in political science, social science, market research, and many others. In this paper, we contend that most previous studies dealing with tweet sentiment classification (TSC) use a suboptimal approach. The reason is that the final goal of most such studies is not estimating the class label (e.g., Positive, Negative, or Neutral) of individual tweets, but estimating the relative frequency (a.k.a. “prevalence”) of the different classes in the dataset. The latter task is called quantification, and recent research has convincingly shown that it should be tackled as a task of its own, using learning algorithms and evaluation measures different from those used for classification. In this paper, we show (by carrying out experiments using two learners, seven quantification-specific algorithms, and 11 TSC datasets) that using quantification-specific algorithms produces substantially better class frequency estimates than a state-of-the-art classification-oriented algorithm routinely used in TSC. We thus argue that researchers interested in tweet sentiment prevalence should switch to quantification-specific (instead of classification-specific) learning algorithms and evaluation measures. This is an extended version of a paper with the title “Tweet Sentiment: From Classification to Quantification” which appears in the Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2015). 2016-04-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/4547 info:doi/10.1007/s13278-016-0327-z https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/5550/viewcontent/classification_quantification_tweet.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Databases and Information Systems |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Databases and Information Systems |
spellingShingle |
Databases and Information Systems GAO, Wei SEBASTIANI, Fabrizio From classification to quantification in tweet sentiment analysis |
description |
entiment classification has become a ubiquitous enabling technology in the Twittersphere, since classifying tweets according to the sentiment they convey towards a given entity (be it a product, a person, a political party, or a policy) has many applications in political science, social science, market research, and many others. In this paper, we contend that most previous studies dealing with tweet sentiment classification (TSC) use a suboptimal approach. The reason is that the final goal of most such studies is not estimating the class label (e.g., Positive, Negative, or Neutral) of individual tweets, but estimating the relative frequency (a.k.a. “prevalence”) of the different classes in the dataset. The latter task is called quantification, and recent research has convincingly shown that it should be tackled as a task of its own, using learning algorithms and evaluation measures different from those used for classification. In this paper, we show (by carrying out experiments using two learners, seven quantification-specific algorithms, and 11 TSC datasets) that using quantification-specific algorithms produces substantially better class frequency estimates than a state-of-the-art classification-oriented algorithm routinely used in TSC. We thus argue that researchers interested in tweet sentiment prevalence should switch to quantification-specific (instead of classification-specific) learning algorithms and evaluation measures. This is an extended version of a paper with the title “Tweet Sentiment: From Classification to Quantification” which appears in the Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2015). |
format |
text |
author |
GAO, Wei SEBASTIANI, Fabrizio |
author_facet |
GAO, Wei SEBASTIANI, Fabrizio |
author_sort |
GAO, Wei |
title |
From classification to quantification in tweet sentiment analysis |
title_short |
From classification to quantification in tweet sentiment analysis |
title_full |
From classification to quantification in tweet sentiment analysis |
title_fullStr |
From classification to quantification in tweet sentiment analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
From classification to quantification in tweet sentiment analysis |
title_sort |
from classification to quantification in tweet sentiment analysis |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/4547 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/5550/viewcontent/classification_quantification_tweet.pdf |
_version_ |
1770574910590025728 |