LiFi: Line-of-sight identification with WiFi

Wireless LANs, especially WiFi, have been pervasively deployed and have fostered myriad wireless communication services and ubiquitous computing applications. A primary concern in designing each scenario-tailored application is to combat harsh indoor propagation environments, particularly Non-LineOf...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ZHOU, Zimu, YANG, Zheng, WU, Chenshu, SUN, Wei, LIU, Yunhao
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/4756
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/5759/viewcontent/10.1109_INFOCOM.2014.6848217.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
Description
Summary:Wireless LANs, especially WiFi, have been pervasively deployed and have fostered myriad wireless communication services and ubiquitous computing applications. A primary concern in designing each scenario-tailored application is to combat harsh indoor propagation environments, particularly Non-LineOf-Sight (NLOS) propagation. The ability to distinguish LineOf-Sight (LOS) path from NLOS paths acts as a key enabler for adaptive communication, cognitive radios, robust localization, etc. Enabling such capability on commodity WiFi infrastructure, however, is prohibitive due to the coarse multipath resolution with mere MAC layer RSSI. In this work, we dive into the PHY layer and strive to eliminate irrelevant noise and NLOS paths with long delays from the multipath channel responses. To further break away from the intrinsic bandwidth limit of WiFi, we extend to the spatial domain and harness natural mobility to magnify the randomness of NLOS paths while retaining the deterministic nature of the LOS component. We prototype LiFi, a statistical LOS identification scheme for commodity WiFi infrastructure and evaluate it in typical indoor environments covering an area of 1500m2. Experimental results demonstrate an overall LOS identification rate of 90.4% with a false alarm rate of 9.3%.