Timed dataflow: Reducing communication overhead for distributed machine learning systems
Many distributed machine learning (ML) systems exhibit high communication overhead when dealing with big data sets. Our investigations showed that popular distributed ML systems could spend about an order of magnitude more time on network communication than computation to train ML models containing...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/4834 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | Many distributed machine learning (ML) systems exhibit high communication overhead when dealing with big data sets. Our investigations showed that popular distributed ML systems could spend about an order of magnitude more time on network communication than computation to train ML models containing millions of parameters. Such high communication overhead is mainly caused by two operations: pulling parameters and pushing gradients. In this paper, we propose an approach called Timed Dataflow (TDF) to deal with this problem via reducing network traffic using three techniques: a timed parameter storage system, a hybrid parameter filter and a hybrid gradient filter. In particular, the timed parameter storage technique and the hybrid parameter filter enable servers to discard unchanged parameters during the pull operation, and the hybrid gradient filter allows servers to drop gradients selectively during the push operation. Therefore, TDF could reduce the network traffic and communication time significantly. Extensive performance evaluations in a real testbed showed that TDF could reduce up to 77% and 79% of network traffic for the pull and push operations, respectively. As a result, TDF could speed up model training by a factor of up to 4 without sacrificing much accuracy for some popular ML models, compared to systems not using TDF. |
---|