The AutoProof Verifier: Usability by non-experts and on standard code
Formal verification tools are often developed by experts for experts; as a result, their usability by programmers with little formal methods experience may be severely limited. In this paper, we discuss this general phenomenon with reference to AutoProof: a tool that can verify the full functional c...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/4920 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/5923/viewcontent/Furia_PT.F_IDE.2015.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-5923 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-59232020-02-13T06:55:16Z The AutoProof Verifier: Usability by non-experts and on standard code FURIA, Carlo A. POSKITT, Christopher M. TSCHANNEN, Julian Formal verification tools are often developed by experts for experts; as a result, their usability by programmers with little formal methods experience may be severely limited. In this paper, we discuss this general phenomenon with reference to AutoProof: a tool that can verify the full functional correctness of object-oriented software. In particular, we present our experiences of using AutoProof in two contrasting contexts representative of non-expert usage. First, we discuss its usability by students in a graduate course on software verification, who were tasked with verifying implementations of various sorting algorithms. Second, we evaluate its usability in verifying code developed for programming assignments of an undergraduate course. The first scenario represents usability by serious non-experts; the second represents usability on "standard code", developed without full functional verification in mind. We report our experiences and lessons learnt, from which we derive some general suggestions for furthering the development of verification tools with respect to improving their usability. 2015-08-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/4920 info:doi/10.4204/EPTCS.187.4 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/5923/viewcontent/Furia_PT.F_IDE.2015.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Theory and Algorithms |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Theory and Algorithms |
spellingShingle |
Theory and Algorithms FURIA, Carlo A. POSKITT, Christopher M. TSCHANNEN, Julian The AutoProof Verifier: Usability by non-experts and on standard code |
description |
Formal verification tools are often developed by experts for experts; as a result, their usability by programmers with little formal methods experience may be severely limited. In this paper, we discuss this general phenomenon with reference to AutoProof: a tool that can verify the full functional correctness of object-oriented software. In particular, we present our experiences of using AutoProof in two contrasting contexts representative of non-expert usage. First, we discuss its usability by students in a graduate course on software verification, who were tasked with verifying implementations of various sorting algorithms. Second, we evaluate its usability in verifying code developed for programming assignments of an undergraduate course. The first scenario represents usability by serious non-experts; the second represents usability on "standard code", developed without full functional verification in mind. We report our experiences and lessons learnt, from which we derive some general suggestions for furthering the development of verification tools with respect to improving their usability. |
format |
text |
author |
FURIA, Carlo A. POSKITT, Christopher M. TSCHANNEN, Julian |
author_facet |
FURIA, Carlo A. POSKITT, Christopher M. TSCHANNEN, Julian |
author_sort |
FURIA, Carlo A. |
title |
The AutoProof Verifier: Usability by non-experts and on standard code |
title_short |
The AutoProof Verifier: Usability by non-experts and on standard code |
title_full |
The AutoProof Verifier: Usability by non-experts and on standard code |
title_fullStr |
The AutoProof Verifier: Usability by non-experts and on standard code |
title_full_unstemmed |
The AutoProof Verifier: Usability by non-experts and on standard code |
title_sort |
autoproof verifier: usability by non-experts and on standard code |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/4920 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/5923/viewcontent/Furia_PT.F_IDE.2015.pdf |
_version_ |
1770575095794761728 |