Differencing labeled transition systems
Concurrent programs often use Labeled Transition Systems (LTSs) as their operational semantic models, which provide the basis for automatic system analysis and verification. System behaviors (generated from the operational semantics) evolve as programs evolve for fixing bugs or implementing new user...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2011
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/5031 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/6034/viewcontent/Differencing_Labeled.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-6034 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-60342020-03-12T08:38:37Z Differencing labeled transition systems XING, Zhenchang SUN, Jun LIU, Yang DONG, Jin Song Concurrent programs often use Labeled Transition Systems (LTSs) as their operational semantic models, which provide the basis for automatic system analysis and verification. System behaviors (generated from the operational semantics) evolve as programs evolve for fixing bugs or implementing new user requirements. Even when a program remains unchanged, its LTS models explored by a model checker or analyzer may be different due to the application of different exploration methods. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach (named SpecDiff) to computing the differences between two LTSs, representing the evolving behaviors of a concurrent program. SpecDiff considers LTSs as Typed Attributed Graphs (TAGs), in which states and transitions are encoded in finite dimensional vector spaces. It then computes a maximum common subgraph of two TAGs, which represents an optimal matching of states and transitions between two evolving LTSs of the concurrent program. SpecDiff has been implemented in our home grown model checker framework PAT. Our evaluation demonstrates that SpecDiff can assist in debugging system faults, understanding the impacts of state reduction techniques, and revealing system change patterns. 2011-10-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/5031 info:doi/10.1007/978-3-642-24559-6_36 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/6034/viewcontent/Differencing_Labeled.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Model Checker Operational Semantic Label Transition System Concurrent Program Symbolic Execution Software Engineering |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Model Checker Operational Semantic Label Transition System Concurrent Program Symbolic Execution Software Engineering |
spellingShingle |
Model Checker Operational Semantic Label Transition System Concurrent Program Symbolic Execution Software Engineering XING, Zhenchang SUN, Jun LIU, Yang DONG, Jin Song Differencing labeled transition systems |
description |
Concurrent programs often use Labeled Transition Systems (LTSs) as their operational semantic models, which provide the basis for automatic system analysis and verification. System behaviors (generated from the operational semantics) evolve as programs evolve for fixing bugs or implementing new user requirements. Even when a program remains unchanged, its LTS models explored by a model checker or analyzer may be different due to the application of different exploration methods. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach (named SpecDiff) to computing the differences between two LTSs, representing the evolving behaviors of a concurrent program. SpecDiff considers LTSs as Typed Attributed Graphs (TAGs), in which states and transitions are encoded in finite dimensional vector spaces. It then computes a maximum common subgraph of two TAGs, which represents an optimal matching of states and transitions between two evolving LTSs of the concurrent program. SpecDiff has been implemented in our home grown model checker framework PAT. Our evaluation demonstrates that SpecDiff can assist in debugging system faults, understanding the impacts of state reduction techniques, and revealing system change patterns. |
format |
text |
author |
XING, Zhenchang SUN, Jun LIU, Yang DONG, Jin Song |
author_facet |
XING, Zhenchang SUN, Jun LIU, Yang DONG, Jin Song |
author_sort |
XING, Zhenchang |
title |
Differencing labeled transition systems |
title_short |
Differencing labeled transition systems |
title_full |
Differencing labeled transition systems |
title_fullStr |
Differencing labeled transition systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Differencing labeled transition systems |
title_sort |
differencing labeled transition systems |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2011 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/5031 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/6034/viewcontent/Differencing_Labeled.pdf |
_version_ |
1770575194187890688 |