Cognitive architectures and autonomy: Commentary and response

This paper provides a very useful and promising analysis and comparison of current architectures of autonomous intelligent systems acting in real time and specific contexts, with all their constraints. The chosen issue of Cognitive Architectures and Autonomy is really a challenge for AI current proj...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: DUCH, Włodzisław, TAN, Ah-hwee, FRANKLIN, Stan
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/5211
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/6214/viewcontent/_19460163___Journal_of_Artificial_General_Intelligence__Cognitive_architectures_and_autonomy__Commentary_and_Response.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sis_research-6214
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sis_research-62142020-07-23T18:38:44Z Cognitive architectures and autonomy: Commentary and response DUCH, Włodzisław TAN, Ah-hwee FRANKLIN, Stan This paper provides a very useful and promising analysis and comparison of current architectures of autonomous intelligent systems acting in real time and specific contexts, with all their constraints. The chosen issue of Cognitive Architectures and Autonomy is really a challenge for AI current projects and future research. I appreciate and endorse not only that challenge but many specific choices and claims; in particular: (i) that “autonomy” is a key concept for general intelligent systems; (ii) that “a core issue in cognitive architecture is the integration of cognitive processes ....”; (iii) the analysis of features and capabilities missing in current architectures; (iv) that an appropriate benchmark is still lacking; (v) the stress on “real time”, on learning, on “resource management” (though goals and motivation would deserve a more central role); and especially (vi) the nice characterization of “some key features that a robot’s mind must possess” (attention, expectation, models, ...). 2012-11-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/5211 info:doi/10.2478/v10229-011-0016-2 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/6214/viewcontent/_19460163___Journal_of_Artificial_General_Intelligence__Cognitive_architectures_and_autonomy__Commentary_and_Response.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Computer and Systems Architecture Databases and Information Systems
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Artificial Intelligence and Robotics
Computer and Systems Architecture
Databases and Information Systems
spellingShingle Artificial Intelligence and Robotics
Computer and Systems Architecture
Databases and Information Systems
DUCH, Włodzisław
TAN, Ah-hwee
FRANKLIN, Stan
Cognitive architectures and autonomy: Commentary and response
description This paper provides a very useful and promising analysis and comparison of current architectures of autonomous intelligent systems acting in real time and specific contexts, with all their constraints. The chosen issue of Cognitive Architectures and Autonomy is really a challenge for AI current projects and future research. I appreciate and endorse not only that challenge but many specific choices and claims; in particular: (i) that “autonomy” is a key concept for general intelligent systems; (ii) that “a core issue in cognitive architecture is the integration of cognitive processes ....”; (iii) the analysis of features and capabilities missing in current architectures; (iv) that an appropriate benchmark is still lacking; (v) the stress on “real time”, on learning, on “resource management” (though goals and motivation would deserve a more central role); and especially (vi) the nice characterization of “some key features that a robot’s mind must possess” (attention, expectation, models, ...).
format text
author DUCH, Włodzisław
TAN, Ah-hwee
FRANKLIN, Stan
author_facet DUCH, Włodzisław
TAN, Ah-hwee
FRANKLIN, Stan
author_sort DUCH, Włodzisław
title Cognitive architectures and autonomy: Commentary and response
title_short Cognitive architectures and autonomy: Commentary and response
title_full Cognitive architectures and autonomy: Commentary and response
title_fullStr Cognitive architectures and autonomy: Commentary and response
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive architectures and autonomy: Commentary and response
title_sort cognitive architectures and autonomy: commentary and response
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2012
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/5211
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/6214/viewcontent/_19460163___Journal_of_Artificial_General_Intelligence__Cognitive_architectures_and_autonomy__Commentary_and_Response.pdf
_version_ 1770575333833048064