Prevalence, Contents and Automatic Detection of KL-SATD
When developers use different keywords such as TODO and FIXME in source code comments to describe self-admitted technical debt (SATD), we refer it as Keyword-Labeled SATD (KL-SATD). We study KL-SATD from 33 software repositories with 13,588 KL-SATD comments. We find that the median percentage of KL-...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | text |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/5624 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/6627/viewcontent/KL_SATD_2020_pv.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Singapore Management University |
| Language: | English |
| Summary: | When developers use different keywords such as TODO and FIXME in source code comments to describe self-admitted technical debt (SATD), we refer it as Keyword-Labeled SATD (KL-SATD). We study KL-SATD from 33 software repositories with 13,588 KL-SATD comments. We find that the median percentage of KL-SATD comments among all comments is only 1,52%. We find that KL-SATD comment contents include words expressing code changes and uncertainty, such as remove, fix, maybe and probably. This makes them different compared to other comments. KL-SATD comment contents are similar to manually labeled SATD comments of prior work. Our machine learning classifier using logistic Lasso regression has good performance in detecting KL-SATD comments (AUC-ROC 0.88). Finally, we demonstrate that using machine learning we can identify comments that are currently missing but which should have a SATD keyword in them. Automating SATD identification of comments that lack SATD keywords can save time and effort by replacing manual identification of comments. Using KL-SATD offers a potential to bootstrap a complete SATD detector. |
|---|