A systematic media frame analysis of 1.5 million New York Times articles from 2000 to 2017

Framing is an indispensable narrative device for news media because even the same facts may lead to conflicting understandings if deliberate framing is employed. Therefore, identifying media framing is a crucial step to understanding how news media influence the public. Framing is, however, difficul...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: KWAK, Haewoon, AN, Jisun
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/5655
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/6658/viewcontent/kwak2020nyt.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Singapore Management University
Language: English
id sg-smu-ink.sis_research-6658
record_format dspace
spelling sg-smu-ink.sis_research-66582021-01-22T02:59:40Z A systematic media frame analysis of 1.5 million New York Times articles from 2000 to 2017 KWAK, Haewoon AN, Jisun Framing is an indispensable narrative device for news media because even the same facts may lead to conflicting understandings if deliberate framing is employed. Therefore, identifying media framing is a crucial step to understanding how news media influence the public. Framing is, however, difficult to operationalize and detect, and thus traditional media framing studies had to rely on manual annotation, which is challenging to scale up to massive news datasets. Here, by developing a media frame classifier that achieves state-of-the-art performance, we systematically analyze the media frames of 1.5 million New York Times articles published from 2000 to 2017. By examining the ebb and flow of media frames over almost two decades, we show that short-term frame abundance fluctuation closely corresponds to major events, while there also exist several long-term trends, such as the gradually increasing prevalence of the “Cultural identity” frame. By examining specific topics and sentiments, we identify characteristics and dynamics of each frame. Finally, as a case study, we delve into the framing of mass shootings, revealing three major framing patterns. Our scalable, computational approach to massive news datasets opens up new pathways for systematic media framing studies. 2020-07-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/5655 info:doi/10.1145/3394231.3397921 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/6658/viewcontent/kwak2020nyt.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Computational journalism Media frames corpus Media framing Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing
institution Singapore Management University
building SMU Libraries
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider SMU Libraries
collection InK@SMU
language English
topic Computational journalism
Media frames corpus
Media framing
Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing
spellingShingle Computational journalism
Media frames corpus
Media framing
Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing
KWAK, Haewoon
AN, Jisun
A systematic media frame analysis of 1.5 million New York Times articles from 2000 to 2017
description Framing is an indispensable narrative device for news media because even the same facts may lead to conflicting understandings if deliberate framing is employed. Therefore, identifying media framing is a crucial step to understanding how news media influence the public. Framing is, however, difficult to operationalize and detect, and thus traditional media framing studies had to rely on manual annotation, which is challenging to scale up to massive news datasets. Here, by developing a media frame classifier that achieves state-of-the-art performance, we systematically analyze the media frames of 1.5 million New York Times articles published from 2000 to 2017. By examining the ebb and flow of media frames over almost two decades, we show that short-term frame abundance fluctuation closely corresponds to major events, while there also exist several long-term trends, such as the gradually increasing prevalence of the “Cultural identity” frame. By examining specific topics and sentiments, we identify characteristics and dynamics of each frame. Finally, as a case study, we delve into the framing of mass shootings, revealing three major framing patterns. Our scalable, computational approach to massive news datasets opens up new pathways for systematic media framing studies.
format text
author KWAK, Haewoon
AN, Jisun
author_facet KWAK, Haewoon
AN, Jisun
author_sort KWAK, Haewoon
title A systematic media frame analysis of 1.5 million New York Times articles from 2000 to 2017
title_short A systematic media frame analysis of 1.5 million New York Times articles from 2000 to 2017
title_full A systematic media frame analysis of 1.5 million New York Times articles from 2000 to 2017
title_fullStr A systematic media frame analysis of 1.5 million New York Times articles from 2000 to 2017
title_full_unstemmed A systematic media frame analysis of 1.5 million New York Times articles from 2000 to 2017
title_sort systematic media frame analysis of 1.5 million new york times articles from 2000 to 2017
publisher Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
publishDate 2020
url https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/5655
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/6658/viewcontent/kwak2020nyt.pdf
_version_ 1770575551376916480