A systematic media frame analysis of 1.5 million New York Times articles from 2000 to 2017
Framing is an indispensable narrative device for news media because even the same facts may lead to conflicting understandings if deliberate framing is employed. Therefore, identifying media framing is a crucial step to understanding how news media influence the public. Framing is, however, difficul...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/5655 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/6658/viewcontent/kwak2020nyt.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Singapore Management University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-6658 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-smu-ink.sis_research-66582021-01-22T02:59:40Z A systematic media frame analysis of 1.5 million New York Times articles from 2000 to 2017 KWAK, Haewoon AN, Jisun Framing is an indispensable narrative device for news media because even the same facts may lead to conflicting understandings if deliberate framing is employed. Therefore, identifying media framing is a crucial step to understanding how news media influence the public. Framing is, however, difficult to operationalize and detect, and thus traditional media framing studies had to rely on manual annotation, which is challenging to scale up to massive news datasets. Here, by developing a media frame classifier that achieves state-of-the-art performance, we systematically analyze the media frames of 1.5 million New York Times articles published from 2000 to 2017. By examining the ebb and flow of media frames over almost two decades, we show that short-term frame abundance fluctuation closely corresponds to major events, while there also exist several long-term trends, such as the gradually increasing prevalence of the “Cultural identity” frame. By examining specific topics and sentiments, we identify characteristics and dynamics of each frame. Finally, as a case study, we delve into the framing of mass shootings, revealing three major framing patterns. Our scalable, computational approach to massive news datasets opens up new pathways for systematic media framing studies. 2020-07-01T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/5655 info:doi/10.1145/3394231.3397921 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/6658/viewcontent/kwak2020nyt.pdf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Research Collection School Of Computing and Information Systems eng Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University Computational journalism Media frames corpus Media framing Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing |
institution |
Singapore Management University |
building |
SMU Libraries |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
SMU Libraries |
collection |
InK@SMU |
language |
English |
topic |
Computational journalism Media frames corpus Media framing Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing |
spellingShingle |
Computational journalism Media frames corpus Media framing Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing KWAK, Haewoon AN, Jisun A systematic media frame analysis of 1.5 million New York Times articles from 2000 to 2017 |
description |
Framing is an indispensable narrative device for news media because even the same facts may lead to conflicting understandings if deliberate framing is employed. Therefore, identifying media framing is a crucial step to understanding how news media influence the public. Framing is, however, difficult to operationalize and detect, and thus traditional media framing studies had to rely on manual annotation, which is challenging to scale up to massive news datasets. Here, by developing a media frame classifier that achieves state-of-the-art performance, we systematically analyze the media frames of 1.5 million New York Times articles published from 2000 to 2017. By examining the ebb and flow of media frames over almost two decades, we show that short-term frame abundance fluctuation closely corresponds to major events, while there also exist several long-term trends, such as the gradually increasing prevalence of the “Cultural identity” frame. By examining specific topics and sentiments, we identify characteristics and dynamics of each frame. Finally, as a case study, we delve into the framing of mass shootings, revealing three major framing patterns. Our scalable, computational approach to massive news datasets opens up new pathways for systematic media framing studies. |
format |
text |
author |
KWAK, Haewoon AN, Jisun |
author_facet |
KWAK, Haewoon AN, Jisun |
author_sort |
KWAK, Haewoon |
title |
A systematic media frame analysis of 1.5 million New York Times articles from 2000 to 2017 |
title_short |
A systematic media frame analysis of 1.5 million New York Times articles from 2000 to 2017 |
title_full |
A systematic media frame analysis of 1.5 million New York Times articles from 2000 to 2017 |
title_fullStr |
A systematic media frame analysis of 1.5 million New York Times articles from 2000 to 2017 |
title_full_unstemmed |
A systematic media frame analysis of 1.5 million New York Times articles from 2000 to 2017 |
title_sort |
systematic media frame analysis of 1.5 million new york times articles from 2000 to 2017 |
publisher |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/5655 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/6658/viewcontent/kwak2020nyt.pdf |
_version_ |
1770575551376916480 |