Robust, fine-grained occupancy estimation via combined camera & WiFi indoor localization
We describe the development of a robust, accurate and practically-validated technique for estimating the occupancy count in indoor spaces, based on a combination of WiFi & video sensing. While fusing these two sensing-based inputs is conceptually straightforward, the paper demonstrates and tackl...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | text |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University
2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/5668 https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/sis_research/article/6672/viewcontent/Robust__Fine_Grained_Occupancy_Estimation_via_Combined_Camera___WiFi_Indoor_Localization_IEEE.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Singapore Management University |
| Language: | English |
| Summary: | We describe the development of a robust, accurate and practically-validated technique for estimating the occupancy count in indoor spaces, based on a combination of WiFi & video sensing. While fusing these two sensing-based inputs is conceptually straightforward, the paper demonstrates and tackles the complexity that arises from several practical artefacts, such as (i) over-counting when a single individual uses multiple WiFi devices and under-counting when the individual has no such device; (ii) corresponding errors in image analysis due to real-world artefacts, such as occlusion, and (iii) the variable errors in mapping image bounding boxes (which can include multiple possible types of human views: fhead, torso, full-bodyg) to location coordinates. We develop statistical techniques to overcome these practical challenges, and finally propose a novel fusion algorithm, based on inexact bipartite matching of these two streams of independent estimates, to estimate the occupancy in complex, multi-inhabitant indoor spaces (such as university labs). We experimentally demonstrate that this estimation technique is robust and accurate, achieving less than 20% error, in an approx. 85m2 lab space (with the error staying below 30% in a smaller 25m2 area), across a wide variety of occupancy conditions. |
|---|